Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
We're supposed to be opposing that in all cases, not merely when we don't like the outcome.

I am opposing it. Just pointing out that the judiciary has no trouble "making" law. Congress passed a law which essentially said, "due process requires a review of the case". The judiciary blew us off. That along with all the other things that have been foisted by our judiciary requires action.

2,265 posted on 03/31/2005 4:58:04 PM PST by AndrewC (All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2260 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
Congress passed a law which essentially said, "due process requires a review of the case".

And they got it - neither Whittemore or the 11'th found due process violations. What Congress should have done is mandated injunctive relief - that would have put the tube back in pending a full-blown rehearing at the federal level. But they didn't. They could have saved her, and they didn't.

2,307 posted on 03/31/2005 5:29:50 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson