To: AndrewC
Congress passed a law which essentially said, "due process requires a review of the case". And they got it - neither Whittemore or the 11'th found due process violations. What Congress should have done is mandated injunctive relief - that would have put the tube back in pending a full-blown rehearing at the federal level. But they didn't. They could have saved her, and they didn't.
2,307 posted on
03/31/2005 5:29:50 PM PST by
general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
To: general_re
And they got it - neither Whittemore or the 11'th found due process violations.No they didn't. They required a de novo review. That was admitted in one of the decisions. It was not given.
2,410 posted on
03/31/2005 6:38:17 PM PST by
AndrewC
(All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson