[Destro]

Separation of powers also means that the executive branch is not bound by the rulings of the judicial branch.

Yes it does - checks and balances - sheesh.

[txradioguy]

But the courts were NEVER designed to hold more power over the law than the other two branches. Which is the case this country today.

The checks and balances are being trumped by the false notion that every thing is subject to judicial review.

[Modok]

What are the checks and balances on the judicial branch of government these days?

[Truthsearcher]

Which means the governor can act if he believes the judge to be wrong.

That he hasn't done so is disappointing, though perhaps not surprising, it doesn't change how I feel about this judge and his ruling though.