Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: QQQQQ
Also -- why isn't anyone asking about the FACT, that when MS was suing the doctors for malpractice, he was doing it on the basis that Terri will live out her full life expectancy, and AFTER he got the money, he suddenly "remembered" that Terri "didn't want to live this way

We're ALL wondering about that one. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't force my mind around all those illogical legal manipulations, but can't Michael's testimony in the malpractice case be used against him, in a wrongful death case or something, to get that award money refunded to the doctors he sued or turned over to Terri's parents?

150 posted on 03/25/2005 5:05:50 PM PST by exDemMom (Euthanasia, NO WAY. Youth in Asia, OF COURSE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

I agree that the award should have been far more restrictive. Let's hope lessons are learned for the future.


154 posted on 03/25/2005 5:18:45 PM PST by Gondring (They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson