Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Fallout Over Schiavo Law
CBS News ^ | March 23, 2005

Posted on 03/24/2005 10:58:30 AM PST by Crackingham

Congressional leaders have insisted their only motivation in getting involved in the Terri Schiavo case was saving a life. But Americans aren’t buying that argument, a CBS News poll finds.

An overwhelming 82 percent of the public believes the Congress and President should stay out of the matter.

Just 13 percent of those polled think Congress intervened in the case out of concern for Schiavo, while 74 percent think it was all about politics. Of those polled, 66 percent said the tube should not be inserted compared to 27 percent who want it restored. The issue has generated strong feelings, with 78 percent of those polled -- wheter for either side of the issue -- saying they have strong feelings.

Public approval of Congress has suffered as a result; at 34 percent, it is the lowest it has been since 1997, dropping from 41 percent last month. Now at 43 percent, President Bush’s approval rating is also lower than it was a month ago.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: cbsnews; poll; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: Crackingham

22 posted on 03/24/2005 11:46:21 AM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

MSM BIAS ALERT!!!!!!


23 posted on 03/24/2005 11:49:18 AM PST by mowkeka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Well perhaps if the MSM was reporting that Congress has the RIGHT to do it, as dictated in the Constitution, Article III, Section 1&2, people would be more apt to SUPPORT it...


24 posted on 03/24/2005 11:50:29 AM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex 98C MI Dude

"why do I not believe this poll"

The answer is that you would not believe any poll that disagreed with your preconceived notions. It is also patronizing the bulk of the population. The wording of the poll cannot be disguised enough on this simple a matter, people are not stupid, they know what pulling or reinserting the feeding tube means. The percentages might vary somewhat but 66% is pretty high, clearly a majority.


25 posted on 03/24/2005 11:51:27 AM PST by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Turn your TVs off and starve this network!


26 posted on 03/24/2005 11:52:39 AM PST by bust (A biased media is the biggest threat to our democracy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: oldcomputerguy
Since you seem to work on logic, let me spell it out for you.

When an organization wishes to get a predetermined result in a poll, the organization engages people who can tailor the questions asked to evince the responses desired. Knowing this, I choose to disbelieve any poll, whether it agrees with my 'preconceived notions' or not.

If you haven't figured out that the MSM has an agenda, you are not as smart as you think you are. Meanwhile, I am brilliant, and know it. Just ask me.
27 posted on 03/24/2005 12:00:55 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Our legal system is in a PVS. Time to remove it from the public feeding trough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ex 98C MI Dude

"Meanwhile, I am brilliant, and know it. Just ask me."

Well that confirms my comment about patronizing the bulk of the population.


28 posted on 03/24/2005 12:10:19 PM PST by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: oldcomputerguy

I end my post with an old, well known joke and suddenly I'm patronizing the population of the planet?! Get a clue.


29 posted on 03/24/2005 12:13:26 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Our legal system is in a PVS. Time to remove it from the public feeding trough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
DU is now salivating over this CBS hit piece and claiming it's the end of the GOP. They even think now the judicial filibuster is safe, for some reason, and that 2006 will sweep liberals to power.

I love it every time they get all juiced up and then are crushed mercilessly by the facts.

30 posted on 03/24/2005 12:23:47 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex 98C MI Dude

"Get a clue"

My reply was in the same vein as your response.


31 posted on 03/24/2005 12:30:58 PM PST by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pineconeland

The Declaration of Independence claims governments are instituted among men to secure the certain unalienable rights given by God --And first named was the right to Life.Under our Constitution Congress created the Judiciary,Under Our Constitution Congress administers the oath of office that is intended to govern their official acts.Under our Constitution Congress can regulate the powers of the Judiciary. Under our Constitution NO Judge is granted the powers Judge Greer has been allowed assume for himself.If the Courts continue to be confused with the
Rule of Law ,and granted powers not enumerated in the US
Constitution Then there is NO law in America.No Government.
No reason to pretend we are that nation established in 1776.


32 posted on 03/24/2005 12:34:07 PM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
I've already read that the MSM slanted their coverage about 60% Michael Schiavo to about 40% the Schindler's. Often when I turned to a MSM station, the reporter would be saying in a bored voice "Haven't we been over this ground before? Why are we still discussing this?"
CBS may be foolish enough to think that this is will hurt congress and the president. In the short run, a few polls may give a false impression. I think that in the long run that the culture of death mentality will sink the Democrats.
I will always have a vision of an armed policeman standing by Terri's bed in case anyone tried to give her some water. How could our country have come to this? How can anyone think that this is moral or just?
33 posted on 03/24/2005 12:56:26 PM PST by Essie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender

LOL, that's a good one!


34 posted on 03/24/2005 1:20:25 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson