Just woke up, LegalE. Are you talking about the Supreme Court Appeal? No one seems to have the slightest hope for Terri there, for obvious reasons of their past behavior. The Court could simply refuse to even hear the case, right? Their previous pattern...When I fell asleep, everyone was talking about the DCF and if they would try to take custody because of her desperate condition. Nothing up with that? I see only threads about Jeb being finished if he does not act to protect her, now.
The appeal is good, you must read it...Gibbs sites the abuse of Terri, the fact that the judge was not impartial, the fact that all the tesimony for Terri's side was basically ignored while Michael's hearsay stuff is let in, the fact that Felos was even hired and the fact that it was for monetary gain...everything...if they say no, it will be egregious. By the way, we never had standing to go to federal court until the bill was passed....now we do. They did good...even did a whole thing on the bill and the legislative intent....way different appeal this time than the others I read....
Judge Greer does whatever Michael wants him to do. MIchael was just talking about the rule of law.
MICHAEL SCHIAVO, WHY DOH'T YOU TELL 970 WFLA RADIO THAT YOU VIOLATED OVER 353 guardianship rules and you are still running your mouth as guardian? HUH, MICHAEL???? The rule of law goes both ways, ADULTERER AND THIEF.
I am glad you think it was better this time than the other appeals.
On another thread, somebody said Steve Centani from Fox News was holding up a copy of the appeal and referring to obvious errors in it, saying it looked hastily put together and flawed. He was not talking about the merits of the case, as I took it, but the written appeal.
Did not see it myself, and am not doubting your impression, anyhow.
But no one has any faith in the institution of the Supreme Court or the justices, for that matter. Now some have said that they have to admit jurisdiction this time around, because the new law gives it to the Federal Courts. That might be, but I have no faith in them.
Just as I lost any I had when the other courts refused to give the trial de novo that the new law mandated. They all used Greer's old trial record and said the Schindlers failed to show they would prevail in a new trial. Even the 11th circuit voted 10 to 2 for that, in effect, by refusing to hear.
So at this point, I trust not a one of them.
Rather, they depended completely on Greer's finding and refused to accept any testimony, which is exactly the opposite of what the law required them to do.
If the Supremes deny a hearing on this case despite the flagrant judicial disregard of law and past court rulings, it will be the exclamation point on the notion that Judicial Tyranny has overtaken this country.