[shezza]

Thanks for providing the link to the appeal to the Supreme Court. I'm only halfway through the document, but it appears Gibbs has laid out some pretty flagrant violations of law and legislation on behalf of not only George "the Almighty" Greer's court, but the federal courts in disregarding Congress' explicit instructions on "de novo" merits and direction to completely ignore prior state rulings on merit.

Rather, they depended completely on Greer's finding and refused to accept any testimony, which is exactly the opposite of what the law required them to do.

If the Supremes deny a hearing on this case despite the flagrant judicial disregard of law and past court rulings, it will be the exclamation point on the notion that Judicial Tyranny has overtaken this country.

[AndyJackson]

f the Supremes deny a hearing on this case despite the flagrant judicial disregard of law and past court rulings, it will be the exclamation point on the notion that Judicial Tyranny has overtaken this country.

Frankly if this is denied, then I would hope that someone would enter a motion for impeachement against a federal judge, all but two of the 11th circuit court judges and those members of the SC who turned down the appeal - all of them if we cannot figure it out.

If the likely result is that there is a majority to impeach the more conservative SC judges, well, they should have seen it coming. Conservatives who have no regard for the sanctity of life, the rule of law, and the coequal powers of the Congress and the President are not conservatives.

This is not about telling the courts what to find - it is mearly about telling them that they must hold a trial.

[LegalEagle61]

If the Supremes deny a hearing on this case despite the flagrant judicial disregard of law and past court rulings, it will be the exclamation point on the notion that Judicial Tyranny has overtaken this country.


I agree, if they deny with all that evidence that can be presented, it will be egregious....I think it has merit now