From what my observations about Jay Sekulow, I haven't been made aware or seen anything that would give me that opinion of him. I think he was involved way before this in Terri's cause. I heard the comment he made about Gibbs, but I felt he wasn't being anything but factual, as I've heard other attorneys say, about the form and language that was used in the motions before the first Whittemore hearing. I didn't find his comments excessive or volatile at all. Just my 2-1/2 cents.
"I've heard other attorneys say, about the form and language that was used in the motions before the first Whittemore hearing. I didn't find his comments excessive or volatile at all. Just my 2-1/2 cents."
The problem with the first filing was that he went off on a tangent with the religious issue...and should have stuck to the main issue that could've possible won, which is the fact that hearsay testimony was admitted as absolute fact and not only should it have been inadmissible but should be looked at as highly suspicious considering Michael really has abandoned his marriage by fathering children & living in a common law marriage with another woman the last 10 years. He also concentrated too much on slamming Greer...but he cleaned it up in a major way after that and included the important parts in the SCOTUS appl. So I think they may have it right this time. You have to give the guy credit...he has been working around the clock with a judicial system that is a joke and how many attorney's practice at the SCOTUS regularly if at all? Even Sekelow has only tried 13 cases there. Pray....and hope God intervenes...now DCF made 30 separate charges of abuse against Schiavo as well...and I am not sure how they presented that and if that is in this filing or if it is separate...