"I've heard other attorneys say, about the form and language that was used in the motions before the first Whittemore hearing. I didn't find his comments excessive or volatile at all. Just my 2-1/2 cents."
The problem with the first filing was that he went off on a tangent with the religious issue...and should have stuck to the main issue that could've possible won, which is the fact that hearsay testimony was admitted as absolute fact and not only should it have been inadmissible but should be looked at as highly suspicious considering Michael really has abandoned his marriage by fathering children & living in a common law marriage with another woman the last 10 years. He also concentrated too much on slamming Greer...but he cleaned it up in a major way after that and included the important parts in the SCOTUS appl. So I think they may have it right this time. You have to give the guy credit...he has been working around the clock with a judicial system that is a joke and how many attorney's practice at the SCOTUS regularly if at all? Even Sekelow has only tried 13 cases there. Pray....and hope God intervenes...now DCF made 30 separate charges of abuse against Schiavo as well...and I am not sure how they presented that and if that is in this filing or if it is separate...
He sure has .. he's been a soldier .. working around the clock, God love him.
My prayer is that this judge will at long last rule correctly and that Terri will survive until they can hydrate her. God is able.
Good night all. It is in God's Hands
Would it also have been possible to argue that Michael's actions in denying therapy have likely contributed to any diagnosis of PVS, and it would be craven to allow a person to harm another person's condition and then use that same damage as justification for killing them?