Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Camilla Chooses Not to Take Title 'Queen' - Clarence House
Scotsman ^ | 3-22-05 | Laura Elston

Posted on 03/22/2005 1:12:23 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Camilla Parker Bowles does not want to take the title of Queen when the Prince of Wales becomes King, Clarence House insisted today.

She will be known as the Princess Consort when the Prince succeeds to the throne, Communications Secretary Paddy Harverson said.

Mr Harverson firmly denied claims that the Household had misled the public and said the matter had been made clear from the beginning.

“Mrs Parker Bowles’s wishes have been made clear from the start that she does not wish to take the title of Queen and the Prince is in full agreement,” he said.

The Government yesterday confirmed that Camilla would automatically become Queen when the Prince accedes to the throne, unless there was a change in legislation.

But Mr Harverson said that both Clarence House and the Government agreed that Camilla could still choose to take on the title Princess Consort instead without a change in the law.

He said: “The implication of some of today’s media reporting is that Mrs Parker Bowles would have to be called Queen unless there is legislation.

“This is incorrect and not in accordance with the Government’s advice.

“Mrs Parker Bowles can, as she wishes, be referred to as Princess Consort, rather than Queen, without legislation.

“Legislation would only be required if it was deemed necessary to confirm formally that she should not have the title and status of Queen.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: australia; britain; camilla; canada; charles; england; greatbritain; newzealand; princecharles; princeofwales; royals; royalwedding; scotland; uk; unitedkingdom; wales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2005 1:12:24 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

That's a smart PR move.


2 posted on 03/22/2005 1:13:31 PM PST by delapaz (http://www.nixguy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Well this news has just ruined my day. I was so looking forward to Queen Camilla. Now I will have to rush out tomorrow for the newest tabloids to keep up with the events.

I hope Shep Smith covers it on The Fox Report tonight. Maybe even BOR will do his entire show about it.



Seriously. Why does anyone on the planet outside of England, and even in England even care about this and why is it news?

3 posted on 03/22/2005 1:16:49 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I take it she's visited San Francisico recently and is bothered by the connotations?


4 posted on 03/22/2005 1:18:07 PM PST by MortMan (CON is the opposite of PRO. Is Congress therefore the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I think I would call her prince's courtesan....


5 posted on 03/22/2005 1:18:38 PM PST by Red Badger (The South seceded over refusal to end slavery. Blue states want to secede for the same reason......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delapaz; MadIvan

It doesnt matter what she wants to be call.....the law states she will be Queen.....they need to change the law.


6 posted on 03/22/2005 1:18:53 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Unrelated, but figured I'd mention: I took a tour of the Ben and Jerry's factory in VT (yeah I know, hippie to the max but...mmm...ice cream...) and the tour guide said that they had a contest in the UK to name a new flavor. Among the _unsuccessful_ entries:

MINTY PYTHON

VANILLA PARKER BOWLS

:)


7 posted on 03/22/2005 1:19:30 PM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

That Consort title is a step up from Princes Horsefaced Mistress or the Princes Butt Ugly Concubine.

Prince Charles should never be allowed to ascend to the throne based on having proven extremely bad taste in women!


8 posted on 03/22/2005 1:29:21 PM PST by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
It doesnt matter what she wants to be call.....the law states she will be Queen.....they need to change the law.

No its not the law. The spouse of the reigning Monarch is not automatically the Queen or King. That person has whatever title the Monarch declares.

Henry VII waited several years before his wife got the title of Queen. In slightly more modern times Queen Victoria's husband was the Prince Consort, not the King.
9 posted on 03/22/2005 1:33:44 PM PST by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I think the title of 'Her Royal Bow Wow' would be more in line.


10 posted on 03/22/2005 1:33:48 PM PST by duckman (I refuse to use a tag line...I mean it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I agree 1000000% percent... here's what I posted on another thread: "Every time I read a thread about this, I thank God that the men and women who founded this great nation had enough common sense to reject the idiocy of monarchy and heriditary succession. It's sad that some here celebrate it."

Of course, one of our "friends from across the pond" replied, "Every time I read a thread about this, I thank God that he is still gracious enough to bestow a Monarch and Monarchy upon my beloved homeland - yet at the same time I am greatly saddened that self-proclaimed conservatives are so willing to join the greatest project of the leftists and attack Monarchies. Conservatives support Monarchies, leftists attack them."


11 posted on 03/22/2005 1:34:25 PM PST by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: duckman

Good thing she and Chuck are too old to have children. The children would either be ugly or real ugly.


12 posted on 03/22/2005 1:41:54 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: t_skoz
From my neighbor who just moved back here after 2 year assignment in London...

I could't wait to get the f**k out of that country. Bunch of limey socialist a**holes.

13 posted on 03/22/2005 1:42:03 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: duckman
At least we'll be spared the spectacle of Elton John rewriting "Crocodile Rock" for her funeral--or will we???
14 posted on 03/22/2005 1:43:24 PM PST by hunter112 (Total victory, both in the USA and the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

COME, ILL HER, PARK HER BOWELS.


15 posted on 03/22/2005 1:43:44 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
That's a smart PR move.

If their loyal subjects aren't smart enough to get that in writing, meaning the law changed, they deserve what they'll get: Two queens for the price of one.

16 posted on 03/22/2005 1:43:50 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: t_skoz

"Conservatives support Monarchies, leftists attack them."

Yes, but we FReepers are liberals. ;^)


17 posted on 03/22/2005 1:45:15 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

>> He said: “The implication of some of today’s media reporting is that Mrs Parker Bowles would have to be called Queen unless there is legislation. This is incorrect and not in accordance with the Government’s advice. Mrs Parker Bowles can, as she wishes, be referred to as Princess Consort, rather than Queen, without legislation. Legislation would only be required if it was deemed necessary to confirm formally that she should not have the title and status of Queen.” <<

Translation: She can bloody well call herself the Lady of Spain if she wants, just so as we all know she's really the Queen.


18 posted on 03/22/2005 1:47:04 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Legislation would only be required if it was deemed necessary to confirm formally that she should not have the title and status of Queen.

That's a bloody big if, ain't it?

19 posted on 03/22/2005 1:49:09 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I know what Rick James would call her.


20 posted on 03/22/2005 1:52:20 PM PST by sully777 (It's like my momma always said, "Two wrongs don't make a right but two Wrights make an airplane.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson