Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Getting Ready For 'Nuclear Option' To Confirm Judges
Investor's Business Daily ^ | March 22, 2005 | Brian Mitchell

Posted on 03/22/2005 9:11:25 AM PST by MisterRepublican

The alarm came just in time for the usual round of fund raising during Easter recess: Republicans want to change the rules to confirm judges, but Democrats stand ready to stop them by shutting down the Senate.

But last week's shutdown threat wasn't just a money raiser. Democrats really are ready for a Senate shutdown, and Republicans really are just about ready to change the rules.

Senate rules require 60 votes to end debate on most issues. That means the minority party can kill a nomination with just 41 votes. All the minority needs is enough senators to filibuster, saying they won't vote for cloture.

The filibuster has been a fact of life in the Senate for more than 200 years. But with federal courts deciding more and more issues, judicial nominations have become more and more political.

The Supreme Court's recent decision banning execution of underage murderers only added to Republican impatience with judicial filibusters.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; filibuster; judicialnominees; nuclearoption; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2005 9:11:26 AM PST by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
After watching what the judges have done to Terri. I say go NUCLEAR
2 posted on 03/22/2005 9:13:07 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
After watching what the judges have done to Terri. I say go NUCLEAR
3 posted on 03/22/2005 9:13:25 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Maybe Terri Schiavo's ultimate gift to us all will be to give the Republicans in the Senate something akin to a spine.

Pray for Terri.

4 posted on 03/22/2005 9:13:57 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

This would great - would make the Liberals look even more ridiculous and it would shut down the Senate! They couldn't enact any stupid laws while this is happening. Can we get the Senate shutdown for the next few years?


5 posted on 03/22/2005 9:14:37 AM PST by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Of course one thing that hasn't been tried is to make them actually filibuster the old fashioned way: make them talk non-stop 24/7. Don't let them get away with having 41 votes against cloture, make them actually continue the 'debate'.

Just think of the sound-bites we could accumulate for use against them in their next campaign.


6 posted on 03/22/2005 9:15:27 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will understand. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

OH Please Please Please, democWaps,, Shut down the Senate,, Please Please Please!!! (/evil grin) :)


7 posted on 03/22/2005 9:15:49 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Yak, yak, yak, yak, yak.... I'll believe it when I see it.


8 posted on 03/22/2005 9:17:13 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Only time will tell if the Republicans have FINALLY seen the light. I have my doubts, but I hope they prove me wrong.


9 posted on 03/22/2005 9:17:48 AM PST by NRA2BFree (Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Of course one thing that hasn't been tried is to make them actually filibuster the old fashioned way: make them talk non-stop 24/7

_________

I didn't know that they could take a break! When did this change and who changed it?

Anyone?


10 posted on 03/22/2005 9:20:53 AM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Look for, the union label. Go ahead, keep looking, I'll wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

I hope they do this. There's not much point in having power (of numbers) if you aren't prepared to use it.


11 posted on 03/22/2005 9:21:13 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

The Dems can't shut down the Senate. Only a count of 51 comprises the quorum needed to conduct business.


12 posted on 03/22/2005 9:21:46 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

After Terri, capital punishment for minors, and gay marriage, I'm totally fed up with our current judiciary. We really need to bring out the big guns.


13 posted on 03/22/2005 9:22:20 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

The Dems can't shut down the Senate. Only a count of 51 comprises the quorum needed to conduct business.


14 posted on 03/22/2005 9:22:26 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Even the IBD, which usually gets the facts straight, makes a significant mistake, here. Although the filibuster has a history that goes back "two centuries," the same is not true of judicial filibusters.

For 200 years there was never a partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee, and almost none for any other judicial appointment. For 200 years, regardless of the occasional changes in the filibuster rule, the Senate consistently acted by majority only, concerning judges.

The change to filibustering judges is only ten years old, invented by modern Democrats to prevent the President from making his judicial nominations under the Constitution.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Condi Rice & Pierce Flanigan's Father's Hat"

15 posted on 03/22/2005 9:24:18 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Proud to be a FORMER member of the Bar of the US Supreme Court since July, 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
The filibuster has been a fact of life in the Senate for more than 200 years

True but the Super majority hasn't to my understanding.
The constitution requires a SIMPLE majority vote of 51 votes..
I know that the super majority vote for Judicial Nominations is a relatively new.. within the last 40 years or so..
Can anyone confirm when they enacted the SM for nominations ???

16 posted on 03/22/2005 9:25:07 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Thanks BB.. you answered that BEFORE I asked


17 posted on 03/22/2005 9:28:01 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Does anyone else feel that we are finally in a war, cultural etc & this is possibly gong to divide this nation like never before. I have the feeling since this last election that no more of any discussion with a liberal. It's take um out - take no prisioners. That goes for congress & these RINOs.


18 posted on 03/22/2005 9:36:45 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
The Dems can't shut down the Senate. Only a count of 51 comprises the quorum needed to conduct business.

Yes, but don't forget there are a few RINO'S who could vote with the RATS.

19 posted on 03/22/2005 9:37:13 AM PST by NRA2BFree (Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Another relavent issue, were the Dems the first ones to fillibuster judicial nominations? If so, they can't cry about the "nuclear option" because it would only be in response to thier unprecedented action.


20 posted on 03/22/2005 9:39:12 AM PST by Yak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson