To: AaronInCarolina
"Since Greer only allowed evidence that was beneficial to Michael Schiavo's argument"Whoa! Where did you read this little conspiracy ditty?
Totally a lie. and you'd agree it's a lie if you read the transcripts.
To: robertpaulsen
Whoa! Where did you read this little conspiracy ditty?
Totally a lie. and you'd agree it's a lie if you read the transcripts.
You blindly assume that I haven't read read transcripts. You should be more careful in your assumptions. The fact is I HAVE read some of the transcripts. I read the rulings as written directly by Judge Greer regarding the medical opinions of the court-appointed doctor and those appointed by the Schiavo and Schindler familiy. I read how Greer summarily dismissed Dr. Hammefahr's (spelling?) testimony of his experience at treating similar patients. Judge Greer ruled his testimony not credible because the doctor did not bring documents with him that proved or backed up his testimony. He did not offer to allow Dr. Hammesfahr to subsequently present these documents (at least not in the transcript that I read). It was like he was not interested in Dr. Hammesfahr's testimony.
When you make a claim that what I post is a "total lie" you should at least make some marginal attempt to substantiate you accusation. Just my opinion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson