I heard this on Sean Hannity and I thought it was an EXCELLENT point...Michael Schiavo claims to be "staying faithful" to Terri's alleged wish to be starved to death, yet he failed to stay faithful to their wedding vows (which are more provable than the so-called death wish) so WHY should we believe him?? If he can't stay true to his wife in marriage, why would he possibly want to stay true to some flippant remark she made about dying?
Moreover, if the left is so gungo-ho about it's a woman's body and she is the only one who can decide what she can do with it....their primary abortion argument.
So why all of the sudden to we need to listen to a man telling us what to do with his wife's body. Furthermore, listen to a man who is shacking up with another woman, not his wife, and fathered 2 children in open and flagrant adultery.
I am wondering if you picked up on my other point?
If Terri dies, we will never again be able to critize
China, North Korea or anyone else on human rights. They
will laugh in our collective faces.
Maybe this whole thing is a lot bigger than originally
thought. Could someone (behind the scenes) be paying off
Michael and the Judges or perhaps scared them to death?