Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pkp1184
Excellently logical point!

Moreover, if the left is so gungo-ho about it's a woman's body and she is the only one who can decide what she can do with it....their primary abortion argument.

So why all of the sudden to we need to listen to a man telling us what to do with his wife's body. Furthermore, listen to a man who is shacking up with another woman, not his wife, and fathered 2 children in open and flagrant adultery.

1,656 posted on 03/22/2005 8:20:02 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1655 | View Replies ]


To: harpo11

Absolutely...I think, as Rush said, the feminists are sitting this one out because the precedent of death is more important to them than the idea of a husband deciding the fate of his wife. They are giddy at the thought that murder will actually be given sanction, so they can stomach a "man's right" for the time being.

What is taking those slothful 11th circuit judges so LONG!??!

AND WHAT HARM would be done if they would just allow Terri to eat while all the legal wrangling is sorted out? These jerks are just riding the clock and hoping she'll die.


1,660 posted on 03/22/2005 8:25:37 PM PST by pkp1184
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson