Let me know if you would like a link to the judge's decision. He lays it out pretty well.
I would never spend time reading a brief from a Clintoid judge.
I read it thoroughly. He thumbed his nose at the legislation and merely bowed to the already established Florida record ... a record which is in doubt with every passing day and for which remedy the Congress passed legislation. [You're loving this aren't you, contrary. Have a nice evening ...]
No he doesn't. His reasoning is circular - he assumes that which he is supposed to prove through trial. He assumes that he can rest the case on the case heard in the state trial court - which he is expressly directed not to do in the legislation.
If this judge does not want to follow the law laid out by the Congress, then he should have declined to hear the case and passed it on to someone else.