Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.
To me, that would be grounds for the appeals court to give relief (tube re-insertion), and sending the case back to trial to Tampa.

Every Federal judge in the country knows that Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kennedy and Stevens would pull the tube out with their own hands.

And every Federal judge in the country will rule accordingly.

1,562 posted on 03/22/2005 4:02:22 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1558 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

Don't be surprised. Justice Scalia himself said in the Cruzan case that government does not belong in the life-and-death decision-making process.


1,565 posted on 03/22/2005 4:04:43 PM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1562 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

But if there is a trial, there could be such major revelations that would make it politically impossible for the USSC to rule for euthanasia in this case.


1,566 posted on 03/22/2005 4:05:44 PM PST by Theodore R. (Why does the GOP continue to fiddle while Terri burns? Is it cowardice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1562 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

If the case were sent to trial in Tampa, there would be a jury. Wouldn't that save Terri? Or would the USSC say that the law mandating the jury trial is itself unconstitutional?


1,568 posted on 03/22/2005 4:07:14 PM PST by Theodore R. (Why does the GOP continue to fiddle while Terri burns? Is it cowardice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1562 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson