Replies

The court made him guardian, despite obvious conflict of interest. He can easily be removed as guardian by another court. He should have nothing to do with her at all,given his continuous abuse of her.
Like denying her access to outdoors, or having her teeth brushed.Please reconcile that with Schiavo creepy statement that :"she will always be in my heart.

How about refusing medical treatment for an infection?? This directly from the words of Judge Greer himself in trialctorder02-00.pdf linked earlier in this thread:

"In 1994, Mr. Schiavo attempted to refuse medical treatment for an infection being experienced by his wife. His unrefuted testimony was that his decision was based upon medical advice. Mr. and Mrs. Schindler filed an action to have him removed as Guardian based upon numerous allegations, including abuse. Mr. Schaivo relented and authorized the treatment after which a Guardian Ad Litem appointed by this court found that there was no basis to have him removed."

He (Judge Greer) wrote this right after declaring that "Mr. Schiavo has been very motivated in pursuing the best medical care for his wife...". You just can't make this stuff up!

I also have the question... just who was this particular Guardian Ad Litem mentioned above. If it was in fact the judge himself who referred to himself as the anonymous title of Guardian Ad Litem, that would seem to me to be a serious breech of ethics. To refer to a Guardian Ad Litem (presumably himself) in court proceedings but not reveal that it was himself seems to me to be intentionaly deceptive. Any thoughts out there?

Terri has had three GALs over the years. Here is the report of the last one.

Wolfson Report

You are right there.
Ethics don't seem to be in Greer's vocabulary.
He has entertained questions from journalists in his chambers after hearings,,for example.
And it would seem that he was present at the Federal court yesterday,which would be unprecedented.