The decision in this case should have been simple. Her husband wants her to die. Her parents want her to live. Nobody knows what she wants. Regardless of how disabled she is, it hurts no one to give her to her parents and let them take care of her.
Actually, it hurts a lot of people. All of them very justly.
There's a lot of corruption in this case. If Terri lives, it will almost certainly be exposed. Only if she dies is there any hope of keeping it covered up, or at least 'contained'.
>>>The decision in this case should have been simple. Her husband wants her to die. Her parents want her to live. Nobody knows what she wants. Regardless of how disabled she is, it hurts no one to give her to her parents and let them take care of her.<<<<<
AGREED!
Michael was asked that question by a caller on Larry King last night. He said he wants to carry out her wishes. I don't believe his lies. If Michael is right and she can't feel anything, then why does he so strenuously object to her living? His lawyer also admitted that her rehabilitation money went for attorney fees. Michael was asked also how much money he will get, and his crafty lawyer said "he will INHERIT nothing." No mention of life insurance money.