Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Girls Just As Bad As Boys' (College "Girls Gone Wild")
The Chicago Sun-Times ^ | March 21, 2005 | Lori Rakl and Andrew Herrmann

Posted on 03/21/2005 9:49:25 AM PST by MisterRepublican

CARBONDALE -- On the dance floor at Gatsby's II, a popular bar at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, a tall brunette drinks beer from a plastic pitcher while she grinds her backside into a man's body.

A silver disco ball hangs overhead while a blond woman in a pink, pleated miniskirt writhes on her partner's leg.

A girl notices that her boyfriend's attention is wandering. With a manicured hand, she grabs his face and plants a Hollywood-worthy kiss on his mouth.

On this sticky dance floor, littered with plastic cups and packed with gyrating bodies, women are the hunters as much as the hunted.

Traditional stereotypes dictate that men want sex, and women crave love. But, on today's college campuses, students say those gender lines are blurrier than a pair of beer goggles.

When a University of Illinois sorority girl observed over lunch at a Champaign cafe that "guys aren't looking for love," her friend chimed in: "I don't think we can blame it on the guys. I'm not looking for love, either."

Girls are just as bad as boys now," another woman said.

"To guys, [sex is] still like scoring," said author Tom Wolfe, who spent two years on college campuses researching his new novel. "The strange part is that it's become that for girls, too. They'll say, 'I scored Jack last night . . . finally!'''

A federal government survey of 4,600 college students found that slightly more male than female undergrads are virgins.

(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: coeds; justlike1981then; promiscuity; sluts; wherearethepics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381-394 next last
To: Aquinasfan

A severe example to be sure. However, even there, most women move on. It's a wonderful human trait, we can heal almost any wound over time. The loss of spouses, children, parents, etc. A woman may never feel good about an abortion, especially if she comes around to being pro-life, but that doesn't mean she's beating herself up about it 24/7.


261 posted on 03/22/2005 11:39:32 AM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
A chaste person will be happier than an unchaste person

I see you got mocked for this but you're right. I am much happier, even at times when I'd really like to be with someone, than my acquaintances who are out having sex.... one of my friends is pregnant, with no expectation that the guy will marry her. Another is suffering three years later from emotional problems that I think relate to her being promiscuous in her teenage years. And my male friends don't get why none of their relationships ever work out....

It's frustrating to wait but the other choice is much, much worse.

262 posted on 03/22/2005 11:39:35 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Members of the mafia are objectively as happy as the Sisters of Charity?

Depends. A mobster derives happiness from money, beating up his enemies and having sex with attractive women (among other things). If a mobster gets enough of these things, he will objectively be happier than the aformentioned Sister of Charity.

263 posted on 03/22/2005 11:42:05 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Ideally, a man should be the primary breadwinner in the household.

Why?

young woman should be planning on running a household as her primary duty.

Why?

264 posted on 03/22/2005 11:44:00 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Depends. A mobster derives happiness from money, beating up his enemies and having sex with attractive women (among other things). If a mobster gets enough of these things, he will objectively be happier than the aformentioned Sister of Charity.

You're confusing emotion and true happiness, the satisfaction of the deepest desires of the heart. At least I hope so.

Regardless, mobsters aren't happier by either measure.

265 posted on 03/22/2005 11:44:58 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

Between four and five percent.


266 posted on 03/22/2005 11:45:08 AM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: JenB

you're on the right track. Just don't turn into quivering jello and try to justify or explain yourself or defend your stance - you don't owe anyone any explanations. Stay strong, quietly, without nervous mumbles to cynical audiences. Sapirit is on your side :)


267 posted on 03/22/2005 11:46:47 AM PST by Sapirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Ideally, a man should be the primary breadwinner in the household.

Why?

Because the mother's natural role is to be the primary child-rearer. Do you have children? A mother? Ever known any?

young woman should be planning on running a household as her primary duty.

Why?

See above.

268 posted on 03/22/2005 11:47:53 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Sapirit

Hah, I hold a lot of unpopular but right views. Haven't let the fact that everyone thinks I'm weird sway me yet.


269 posted on 03/22/2005 11:48:35 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
The trouble is, when you say that your sexual encounters are meaningless, you're saying that your most serious actions (possible generation of new life/possible contraction of serious disease) are meaningless

This is where your argument falls apart, as always. Through the miracles of modern contraception and medicine, the idea that sex is automatically tied to life and or disease is an outdated concept. Sex can simply be for pleasure.

There is a way out of this. You can repent and serve the Truth.

I've already discovered Mithras, thank you very much. I don't need some Johnnie-come-lately from a backwater of the Roman Empire.

270 posted on 03/22/2005 11:49:06 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: JenB
It's frustrating to wait but the other choice is much, much worse.

Yup. Life isn't easy. There's no point in making it even harder.

271 posted on 03/22/2005 11:49:14 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Sexual intercourse is reserved by nature for a lifelong, exclusive, male/female relationship for the begetting and raising of children, and the mutual care of the spouses.

Nonsense.

This is intuitively obvious and proven by common experience

Translation: This is Aquinasfan's opinion, nothing more.

Therefore, those who reserve intercourse for marriage are happier than those who don't

You have no evidence to support this speculation.

272 posted on 03/22/2005 11:51:12 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Sex can simply be for pleasure.

And if you use something for the purpose it wasn't intended for, what happens? Ever try to drive a nail with a screwdriver, or a screw with a hammer?

You didn't invent sex. It's illogical to assume you can willfully redefine what it means.

273 posted on 03/22/2005 11:51:49 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The moralizers, while I appreciate their point of view, seem to think college kids should act like adults. Maybe they should, but they never will.

What I'm finding especially amusing is the repeated assertion that I'm (or anyone in my position) not happy because I was promiscuous for years before I married. To hear these guys tell it, I should have the most bitter unfilling marriage imaginable, but after all these years, she still rock my world. I'm not unhappy at all.

274 posted on 03/22/2005 11:53:40 AM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Campion

there is really nothing wrong with sex for pleasure even from religious point of view (my religion anyway). Just as long as it is between husband and wife and some other little details.


275 posted on 03/22/2005 11:54:25 AM PST by Sapirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
You're confusing emotion and true happiness, the satisfaction of the deepest desires of the heart. At least I hope so.

For a mobster, the deepest desire of the heart is money, power and sex.

Regardless, mobsters aren't happier by either measure.

Depends on how much money, power and sex they get.

276 posted on 03/22/2005 11:55:26 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Because the mother's natural role is to be the primary child-rearer. Do you have children? A mother? Ever known any?

What leads you to this conclusion, other than your own opinion?

277 posted on 03/22/2005 11:56:39 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: aqua; hamilton; All
Melas just proved my yesterday's point: that there is no rational reason to wait till marriage (only spiritual)
278 posted on 03/22/2005 11:57:18 AM PST by Sapirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Campion
And if you use something for the purpose it wasn't intended for, what happens?

The main purposes of sex is pleasure. Pregnancy is just an unfortunate side effect, which we have figured out how to treat, thankfully.

You didn't invent sex. It's illogical to assume you can willfully redefine what it means.

I am a being with free will. I have the right to define sex however I choose.

279 posted on 03/22/2005 11:59:14 AM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
This is where your argument falls apart, as always. Through the miracles of modern contraception and medicine, the idea that sex is automatically tied to life and or disease is an outdated concept. Sex can simply be for pleasure.

"Sex" is sterile intercourse (when sterility is deliberately induced). The couple says to each other, "I don't want your children."

"Making love" is intercourse that's open to new life. It says, "Our love is so great that it becomes tangible, bringing forth new life."

The latter brings true joy. I hope you experience the difference some day.

280 posted on 03/22/2005 11:59:15 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381-394 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson