"I'll wait for the CNN statement acknowledging that their trasncript is wrong."
I imagine that CNN will, in fact, change their transcript.
But even then, my question still hasn't been answered. Did the tone of his voice change when he allegedly 'paraphased them', role-played them, or 'spoke on their behalf'?
If there was no tone change indicating that he was 'role-playing' them, then it still does, in fact, mean he said 'we', and I can only assume he meant what he said. If there was a tone change, such as a higher pitch for example, then he was, in fact 'paraphrasing' them.
I agree, except for one thing. Michael Schiavo is such a goulish creep, he might not be capable of a tone change, no matter his meaning. Seriously, he is like an evil robot from Mars...
I am going to crash now. My typing is getting poor because I am so tired.
Scoop all you have to do is freep mail me your addy and when I wake up later in the day I will mail it out to you.
Arthur if Scoop does not want it, then I will mail it to you so you can see and hear how he says it. (his wording is very clear...)
CNN will most likely correct the transcript.