Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: floriduh voter
FREEPERS WHAT JUDGE WHITTEMORE SAID TODAY "NO" WAS BASED UPON NOTHING. If it was supposed to be DE NOVO, he cannot look at Judge Greer's prior rulings. JUDGE WHITTEMORE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT DE NOVO MEANS. PLEASE CALL ALL THE NUMBERS IN THIS POST.

Let me clear this up. Whittemore ruled on a motion to restore the feeding tube pending the court's decision on a de novo consideration of the evidence. The standard for issuing such an order is whether there is substantial evidence supporting the moving party's assertion of the facts. In this case, the judge ruled that the Schindlers did not meet that burden of proof. He did not rule on the facts of the case; only on the limited motion. However, this is an extremely good indication of how he would rule on the substantive case.
3,501 posted on 03/22/2005 6:25:13 AM PST by piperpilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3490 | View Replies ]


To: piperpilot

And, obviously, he cannot err on the side of life.


3,507 posted on 03/22/2005 6:27:07 AM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3501 | View Replies ]

To: piperpilot

AGREED.


3,508 posted on 03/22/2005 6:27:38 AM PST by TAdams8591 (The call you make may be the one that saves Terri's life!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3501 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson