Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b4its2late; All

Fox News reported earlier that the minute this is signed into law, that it will face a judicial challenge as the bill has been written too narrowly, and as such, falls under the "Bill of Attainder" restrictions. Hence the law will be ruled unconstituitional.

Are there any atty's on the thread that can enlighten me as to this thinking?


29 posted on 03/20/2005 2:19:12 PM PST by justshe (Become a monthly donor; eliminate Freepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: justshe

I'm a lawyer and my first thought was that it was a bill of attainder. However, I lookd up the history and a key element is missing. A bill of attainder seeks to punish a single person without trial. Here there is no punishment therefore it should pass constitutional muster. Some examples of bills for single persons. Chrysler Bail out, Bills making individuals citizens, Gold Medals for Schwartzkopf at end of Gulf War.


38 posted on 03/20/2005 2:26:47 PM PST by tort_feasor (FreeRepublic.com - Tommorrow's News, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson