Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Ramsbotham; Clara Lou
CL: I could be wrong, but I don't believe that the POTUS is authorized to call out the National Guard in this situation. I'd like for him to stay within his powers. Am I wrong?

MR: I don't think the State of Florida is authorized to starve and dehydrate an innocent person to death. Am I wrong?

We don't know who should do what. Meanwhile, an innocent, cognizant, nonterminal woman's life slowly drains away.

Someone must act at the state or federal level. If a private citizen acts, it will be illegal. A backwater judge in a FLA district court cannot have authority over the elected United States Congress... can he?

If Terri dies this time, we get a legal precedent - one over which many have been salivating. Who's their next victim? Which group will be targeted next?

448 posted on 03/18/2005 8:25:12 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Lexinom
If Terri dies this time, we get a legal precedent
Precedent-- exactly my worry. People who expect the President to step outside of his constitutional powers to act are urging the creation of a precedent-- a precedent dangerous to our entire nation and many more people than just one or a few.
In this case, someone below the level of President can act or the President can act within his powers.
555 posted on 03/19/2005 5:57:17 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson