Thanks for the clarification.
Perhaps what needs to come out of this are more guidelines on what proof is needed before someone can pull the plug when their is a family dispute as to the condition and no living will. Based on the totality of the evidence, I am having a hard time understanding how it can be considered that he's acted and is acting in her best interest.
So what if Terri verbally said something along the lines of wanting to die if she were in a vegetative state at one point to her husband while they were allegedly watching tv, ...how can that alone decide this? What is the declaration of intent if it is not in writing??? It has to be in writing or it means diddle e squat. :)
The death culture who live in the judiciary wants to believe him:
Fact: Husband wants to see her dead..
Fact: Seven years after Terri entered a "coma," the husband said she wanted to die. Hmmmmm....
Fact: Husband has a new life with another squeeze and children.
Fact: Husband has done very little to support her recovery. No speech therapists, no psychical therapists, or any other therapist.
I have no problems figuring out this punk husband.