I agree. And I have to say, Boortz makes a very compelling argument. It's an extremely complicated issue.
This issue should not be about opinions - it should be about facts. The problem is, as I said in my other post to you, Boortz is arguing opinions, not facts. He needs to do his homework on this first.
What part of his facts are you disputing?
"This issue should not be about opinions - it should be about facts."
As for the outcome, you bet. But I agree that opinions can fly everywhere on this, that intelligent people can feel quite justified on either side of this issue. It's amazingly complicated.
It's so easy to get tripped up on this that perhaps it would be best we not judge each other too harshly, even though so much can be revealed about a person from his/her conclusions. We are being tricked into baring our souls, here.