How so? Basically one judge has made the decisions, and he has a conflict of interest. The husband is required by law to file plans about her guardianship and he hasn't done it. How do you explain how he is in violation of the law, yet the judge hasn't forced him to do it?
Beats me - why haven't the appellate courts, right up to the USSC, noticed something so obvious that it's all over FreeRepublic?
If it's all so obvious, why are we the only ones who "know" the truth?