"If her husband was so evil, and so obviously acting against her best interests, if he was taking actions in a suspicious manner to prevent doctors and judges to properly evaluate her condition, then it should be a slam-dunk to have his custody rights rescinded. This sort of thing is done all the time in custody battles."
Because this isn't about custody, it's about abortion and anything that threatens the "right" to kill inconvenient people.
If her husband is evil, why haven't her parents demonstrated this in numerous opportunities to do so? Are you saying claimed obstruction/destruction of evidence (her husband keeping her from being evaluated) was just overlooked by the courts?
Apparently, the only truth about the case resides here on FR threads - everyone actually involved in the case, which we aren't, is evil or just plain wrong. Except the ones who can't seem to prove their case and win. They're right, so the whole mess needs to be AlGored in the courts/legislatures forever.