Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

I don't understand. The article from your link(globalsecurity) is the same as the one I posted( from fas.org). So what exactly is our difference?

A direct quote from your link:

"With an estimated range of only 8,000 km (4,300 nm), the DF-31 can only reach targets along the entire West Coast of the United States and in several northern Rocky Mountain states. Chinese incentives for deploying a missile with such limited capabilities are not self evident.

The DF-41, a 3-stage 12,000 km-range missile similar to the American Minuteman and the Russian Topol SS-25, will apparently be developed using the first two stages of the DF-31 along with a much larger third stage. The larger third stage and longer range of the DF-41 is made possible by the fact that, unlike the DF-31, the size of the DF-41 is not constrained by the requirement that it be fitted into a submarine launch tube. The cancelled 1,700km-range DF-25 ground mobile missile was developed using the first two stages of the DF-31.

In August 2001 it was reported that China was developing a longer range version of its DF-31, designated the DF-31A. The DF-31A will reportedly be able to cover targets throughout the continental U.S. from mainland China."




If DF-31 has not yet entered service and reached operational status, why would chinese be bothered with DF-31A and DF-41?


71 posted on 03/19/2005 9:36:57 AM PST by Pussy_Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Pussy_Cat
Simultaneous development, perhaps? The article isn't identical, by the way.
72 posted on 03/19/2005 9:50:27 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson