You and Sara Brady have the same definition of "common sense".
Obviously I must use the constitution for toilet paper since I disagree with how broadly it be intepreted on a single issue.
The Federalist Papers specifically specify the intent of the 2nd Amendment and define the term "arms". What is to argue here, other than the fact that you join Al Gore in calling for a "living Constitution"?
I was browsing some gun threads on DU the other day. Most of the DUmbasses are better on gun issues than you. That should tell you something.
Thanks for proving my point with a lot of knee-jerk bullcrap. Never mind my opposition to 99% of gun control, my strong advocacy for control-carry, no, because I don't get my panties in a wad over restricting access to AK-47's and rocket launchers I'm automatically no different in my views than Sarah Brady, Al Gore, or the DU.
What an idiot.