Replies

The Khalistanis are not mainstream Sikhs -- mainstream Sikhs are well represented in India (the Prime Minister, head of the army and head of the Communist PArty are all Sikhs). Well, two former Members of Parliament, Simranjit Singh Mann and Atinder Pal Singh, are among those who openly support Khalistan, as does the head of the BKU, the farmers' organization in Punjab. General Narinder Singh is a respected former military officer. Justice Ajit Singh Bains is a respected former Justice of teh Punjab and Haryana High Court. Professor Gurtej Singh is a former IAS and a Professor of Sikhism. These are people who have spoken openly in support of Khalistan.
The Khalistanis also want a state for Sikhs ONLY, quite similar to the ARyan Nation or any IIslamic philosophy.
This is untrue and your Hindustani masters know it, but they apparently forgot to tell you.
The fact is that when Sikhs ruled in Punjab in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, they rna a secular state. A Christian was head of the army. Hindus, Muslims, Chrisitans, and Sikhs all served in high positions in the government.
The Khalistani (proposed) constitution is entirely secular. Everyone's rights will be respected. The Khalistani leadership is publicly and openly committed to that. But apparently, you know better.
Khalistan will be a secular state in which all peoples' rights are recognized, unlike India. That has been said time and time again. It accords with a fundamental prinsiple of the Sikhs: the equality of all people. "Recognize ye all the human race as one." -- Guru Gobind Singh.
They have the commitment, they have the record, it accords with their fundamental philosophy, but somehow you know that it won't happen. Curious. Please let us know how you know this.
And BTW, it wasn't Khalistani leaders who said that everyone who lives in the country must be a member of their religion or subservient to it. Why dont' you go ask your Hindustani masters who that is?

And I still can't figuire out why someone like you would have any objection at all to a group like Aryan Nations. Since you support Hindu militants who oppress others based on religion and ethnicity, Aryan Nations should be right up your alley.

This is untrue and your Hindustani masters know it, but they apparently forgot to tell you.

Really? Then how come the Khalistanis speak otherwise? And again the 'Hindustani' masters jazz -- the True Born Paki speaks, eh?

Khalistan will be a secular state in which all peoples' rights are recognized, unlike India.

Really? Then, how come India's Prime Minister is a Sikh, the suppsoedly oppressed minority according to you?

We really need an edit function on this board.

And I still can't figuire out why someone like you would have any objection at all to a group like Aryan Nations. Since you support Hindu militants who oppress others based on religion and ethnicity, Aryan Nations should be right up your alley.

And how does the True Born Paki assume that I support Hindu militants? Oh, wait, just like the Paki assumes that Christ was a pagan figure, that the CIA was behind 9/11 and that 500,000 Christians were supposedly massacred in India recently. /sarcasm

Your Takkiyya lies wear thin, TrueBornPaki, they wear thin.