Skip to comments.
AIR INDIA - SINGH MALIK - NOT GUILTY
http://www.cknw.com ^
| Me
Posted on 03/16/2005 11:03:15 AM PST by SweetPilotofCanuckistan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: TBP; ekidsohbelaas
Now that's just plain silly and it shows your prejudices big time. Can you show me ANY similarities between the Khalistan movement and groups like Aryan Nations?
The Khalistanis are not mainstream Sikhs -- mainstream Sikhs are well represented in India (the Prime Minister, head of the army and head of the Communist PArty are all Sikhs). The Khalistanis also want a state for Sikhs ONLY, quite similar to the ARyan Nation or any IIslamic philosophy.
And from the tone of your posts, I'mm surprised Aryan Nations bothers you anyway. Who do you think your Hindustani masters are?
Hindustani masters? Hmmmm... so the TrueBornPaki finally speaks.
41
posted on
03/17/2005 9:20:37 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: TBP; thrust; ekidsohbelaas; Gengis Khan
I put out information, facts, details, and this is what I get for aresponse! It works time after time. And these people never have anything to backup their claims but the solemn word of the Indian regime.
You put out no facts, only propaganda that's been disproved time and time again.
42
posted on
03/17/2005 9:22:01 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: Cronos
The Khalistanis are not mainstream Sikhs -- mainstream Sikhs are well represented in India (the Prime Minister, head of the army and head of the Communist PArty are all Sikhs). Well, two former Members of Parliament, Simranjit Singh Mann and Atinder Pal Singh, are among those who openly support Khalistan, as does the head of the BKU, the farmers' organization in Punjab. General Narinder Singh is a respected former military officer. Justice Ajit Singh Bains is a respected former Justice of teh Punjab and Haryana High Court. Professor Gurtej Singh is a former IAS and a Professor of Sikhism. These are people who have spoken openly in support of Khalistan.
The Khalistanis also want a state for Sikhs ONLY, quite similar to the ARyan Nation or any IIslamic philosophy.
This is untrue and your Hindustani masters know it, but they apparently forgot to tell you.
The fact is that when Sikhs ruled in Punjab in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, they rna a secular state. A Christian was head of the army. Hindus, Muslims, Chrisitans, and Sikhs all served in high positions in the government.
The Khalistani (proposed) constitution is entirely secular. Everyone's rights will be respected. The Khalistani leadership is publicly and openly committed to that. But apparently, you know better.
Khalistan will be a secular state in which all peoples' rights are recognized, unlike India. That has been said time and time again. It accords with a fundamental prinsiple of the Sikhs: the equality of all people. "Recognize ye all the human race as one." -- Guru Gobind Singh.
They have the commitment, they have the record, it accords with their fundamental philosophy, but somehow you know that it won't happen. Curious. Please let us know how you know this.
And BTW, it wasn't Khalistani leaders who said that everyone who lives in the country must be a member of their religion or subservient to it. Why dont' you go ask your Hindustani masters who that is?
And I still can't figuire out why someone like you would have any objection at all to a group like Aryan Nations. Since you support Hindu militants who oppress others based on religion and ethnicity, Aryan Nations should be right up your alley.
43
posted on
03/17/2005 9:36:47 AM PST
by
TBP
To: TBP
This is untrue and your Hindustani masters know it, but they apparently forgot to tell you.
Really? Then how come the Khalistanis speak otherwise? And again the 'Hindustani' masters jazz -- the True Born Paki speaks, eh?
44
posted on
03/17/2005 9:41:55 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: TBP
Khalistan will be a secular state in which all peoples' rights are recognized, unlike India.
Really? Then, how come India's Prime Minister is a Sikh, the suppsoedly oppressed minority according to you?
45
posted on
03/17/2005 9:42:41 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: TBP
We really need an edit function on this board.
46
posted on
03/17/2005 9:42:54 AM PST
by
TBP
To: TBP
And I still can't figuire out why someone like you would have any objection at all to a group like Aryan Nations. Since you support Hindu militants who oppress others based on religion and ethnicity, Aryan Nations should be right up your alley.
And how does the True Born Paki assume that I support Hindu militants? Oh, wait, just like the Paki assumes that Christ was a pagan figure, that the CIA was behind 9/11 and that 500,000 Christians were supposedly massacred in India recently. /sarcasm
Your Takkiyya lies wear thin, TrueBornPaki, they wear thin.
47
posted on
03/17/2005 9:44:36 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: Cronos
Really? Then how come the Khalistanis speak otherwise? They don't. As I noted above.
Oh, but I forgot. Your Hindustani masters tell youotherwise, so what they actually say is irrleevant.
48
posted on
03/17/2005 9:48:47 AM PST
by
TBP
To: Cronos
You clearly support a Hinduist regime that, regardless of the party in control, tries to force its Hindu culture, religion, and way of life on non-Hindus by the force not of persuasion, as the Christian missionaries are doing, but of the gun and the bayonet. You excuse the repression of the regime. These people are Hindu militants. Even Congress Party governments carry out repression. It doesn't matter from the perspective of the minorites who is in charge. It just changes the faces of the oppressors.
49
posted on
03/17/2005 9:53:33 AM PST
by
TBP
To: TBP
You clearly support a Hinduist regime that, regardless of the party in control, tries to force its Hindu culture, religion, and way of life on non-Hindus by the force not of persuasion, as the Christian missionaries are doing, but of the gun and the bayonet.
Really? Did you just assume that, just like your asumption that the CIA was behind 9/11 and that Christ was a pagan God?
No, I don't suppose hindu fundamentalists. There is no Hindu 'regime' around.
50
posted on
03/17/2005 9:58:17 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: TBP
Even Congress Party governments carry out repression.
REally, the Congress party, headed by a Christian carry's out repression of Christians???
51
posted on
03/17/2005 9:59:00 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: TBP
Your Hindustani masters tell youotherwise, so what they actually say is irrleevant.
And you my son, are a brainwashed drone. Go back to Pakistan you terrorist supporting scum. What a propoganda machine you are... your Pakistani masters will be proud. Pigs like you give Sikhs a bad name.
52
posted on
03/17/2005 9:59:15 AM PST
by
ekidsohbelaas
(Wahe Guru da Khalsa, Wahe Guru di Fateh)
To: TBP
Oh, but I forgot. Your Hindustani masters tell youotherwise, so what they actually say is irrleevant.
With every post your mask slips further, revealing a True Born Paki Islamicc
53
posted on
03/17/2005 9:59:42 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: Cronos
Really? Did you just assume that, just like your asumption that the CIA was behind 9/11 and that Christ was a pagan God? I don't know where you got the idea that I believe either of these things. If you think I believe these things, then you're not even as bright as you appear, and that's not bright at all.
I don't suppose hindu fundamentalists. There is no Hindu 'regime' around.
Yes there is. It's a regime that oppresses non-Hindu minorities, including Christians, Sikhs, Dalits, and others. And you post all of its disinformation here and make excuses for it.
Thus, you're supporting Hinduist militants. Period.
54
posted on
03/17/2005 11:54:50 AM PST
by
TBP
To: ekidsohbelaas
Evidence?
Oh, right. You and your Hindustani masters don't need any evidence. After all, you haven't posted any yet.
Hindufascism is just as bad as Islamofascism. I can see that they're the same thing. You either can't or aren't allowed to. It might offend your Hindustani masters.
55
posted on
03/17/2005 11:57:25 AM PST
by
TBP
To: TBP
So which religion is in your good books?
To: samsonite
There is much in all religions that I find inspiring. I don't condemn any of them.
57
posted on
03/17/2005 12:32:22 PM PST
by
TBP
To: samsonite; TBP
Nah samsonite, our 'friend' here is pretty definitely Mooselimb. Note the posts he's posted: About Christ being a pagan God
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1344643/posts
And every one of his posts here is pro-Islamic, mixed with his liberal use of Mooselimb terms like 'Hindustani' -- and probably also referring to us as Jews and Kafirs. Nah, TBP = True Born Pakistani.
58
posted on
03/17/2005 1:49:38 PM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: Cronos
Flew Air India myself. Toronto-London 1994. Three long hours to emplane. Security was beyond belief,could not even access my duty free whisky. Fare was $150 less than regular though. (El cheapo here). Irish lady with six month baby in the prefered three seats up front. Scottish Highland lady with shawl yet, to my left.
I thought of those who could orchestrate the Air India double tragedy. I as a working class person, thought of two innocent Japanese baggage handlers- what the hell had they to do with disputes?. Ah thinks I, wicked, wicked bastards, who ever you were. I damn those who triumph in the idiocyncrasies of the law. Americans who make excuses for someone elses terrorism, are either twisted or uninformed. We, who felt a mortal fear for 9/11 and it's mindless barbarity, need no naysayers.
To: Cronos
Don't you know, the Indian government 'murdered over 250,000 Sikhs since 1984'.
The Indian Govt rapes, loots and pillages from Punjab, which is precisely why,
Punjab with a per capita income of Rs 25,652 is the second richest in the country while Haryana (Rs 24,575) ranks fourth. Among the Union Territories, Chandigarh( capital of Punjab) (Rs 48,974) has the highest per capita income in the country, followed by Delhi (Rs 42,818).
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/605728.cms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson