Replies

You are the only person in the world who thinks that the dismemberment of Yugoslavia is a bad thing. Let me in on a fact that you may not know if you were educated by Nehru pro-Soviet propaganda. Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, Montenegro - were all independent before the Soviets "unified" them. After the Soviet Union was gone, people simply went their own way. The Czechs and the Slovaks left without a shot. Yugoslavia would have been fine if it wasn't for Milosevic.

Just because you live in India, that doesn't mean you speak for most Indians. Take a trip into the rural areas of Bihar and Bengal and see how many of your fellow Indians share your feelings. Just because you are an Indian, that doesn't mean I cannot speak for those who would rather be free from Indian fiefdom. India wants to run a modern economy with dark age policies. They have preserved the worst aspects of the British raj, and have invented a few of their own.

Sorry,but I assume you don't know about the majority Freeper's opinions on the breakup of Yugoslavia.The formation of Muslim majority states in the Balkans has already started causing problems for the rest of the world.You have any clue about the money that GCC nations pump into those new countries & where the money trail leads???Ive lived in the Middle East & know the vicious propaganda that was unleashed not against Slobo,but against Christian Serbs.

Ive been to most parts of India & I have a much better idea of how my countrymen think given that I do read a lot of newspapers which are by no means pro-government.How many Indians said they want to be free from India's fiefdom??You have no idea of how your own countrymen think,let alone how Indians think.

Buddy one advise for you...........try not to educate Indians about India just because sometime in your life you made a short trip to India. Ever wondered why the Indians were so "unreceptive" to you? Its because it pi$$es of Indians (whever they may belong) to be told by an outsider as to what is good for them and how they should do things. You were lucky because Indians are polite to outsiders and so they were just "unreceptive". Had it been me.........

You are the only person in the world who thinks that the dismemberment of Yugoslavia is a bad thing.

Sorry, there are a billion other Indians behind him who thinks the same way.

Just because you live in India, that doesn't mean you speak for most Indians. Take a trip into the rural areas of Bihar and Bengal and see how many of your fellow Indians share your feelings. Just because you are an Indian, that doesn't mean I cannot speak for those who would rather be free from Indian fiefdom. India wants to run a modern economy with dark age policies. They have preserved the worst aspects of the British raj, and have invented a few of their own.

He does speak for most Indians I know (and I know more Indians than you do) on the issue of political unity. Me and sukhoi are from diverse background. He is a south Indian Christian and I am Hindu bengali brahmin. I have seen and lived in rural Bengal and Bihar much more than you did. And I know how many Indians share his (sukhoi's) feelings as far as the unity of India goes. As Indians we may have our political differences on who or what party we support but if you tell an average Bihari that breaking India apart would be a good idea, the next thing you might know is you got yourself broken up.

Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, Montenegro - were all independent before the Soviets "unified" them.

Hogwash -- before WWII and the Soviets, there was the State of Yugoslavia -- the state of the Southern Slavs. This was formed out of Serbia, the provinces of Austria-Hungary and Turkey that were liberated after WWI -- before WWI, the Balkan states were members of either the Austro-Hungarian or Ottoman empires -- do read up on your history/