[wardaddy]

That is precisely what she is.

She even describes the pro-lifers as the "other side".

Damn...I asked several of the most ardent Condi worshippers here to prove their false claims that her views were the same as Bush's and these very FReepers knew that thread you were pinged to existed....completly refuting their claims and wasted my time.

What a joke.

That Wash Times article is just more proof she is Pro-Choice.....Pro-Choice lite to be fair but she is no Pro-Lifer.

Geez.

[jwalsh07]

We see this issue alike, in fact we see most issues alike which I guess is why we never debate each other.

Now, I'm always debating my pal Torie. Wonder why? :-}

[FreedomCalls]

She even describes the pro-lifers as the "other side".

The absolutists here describe those who support the three exception rule as on the other side as well.

[Dan from Michigan]

That Wash Times article is just more proof she is Pro-Choice.....Pro-Choice lite to be fair but she is no Pro-Lifer.

It reminds me of Granholm playing the Catholic card to try and be on both sides. Luckily we had a petition drive(that won) that told Granholm that her veto of the PBA ban had no effect. It's now in court.

That reminds me of the old Catholic saying...."You can't be Catholic and pro-choice!!!"

Granted at least Rice is against abortion funding and PBA, but the politicaspeak there certainly didn't gain any support from me.

I hope Rice stays at the State Dept.