[Dan from Michigan]

That Wash Times article is just more proof she is Pro-Choice.....Pro-Choice lite to be fair but she is no Pro-Lifer.

It reminds me of Granholm playing the Catholic card to try and be on both sides. Luckily we had a petition drive(that won) that told Granholm that her veto of the PBA ban had no effect. It's now in court.

That reminds me of the old Catholic saying...."You can't be Catholic and pro-choice!!!"

Granted at least Rice is against abortion funding and PBA, but the politicaspeak there certainly didn't gain any support from me.

I hope Rice stays at the State Dept.

[wardaddy]

There were FReepers here insisting she was the same as W on abortion.

I have never heard W refer to pro-life as "the other side".

She is pro-choice...that's it.....and that makes her for abortion one way or another.

Frankly, I don't have anything other than this issue really against the lady but I cannot for a moment understand this fawning over her.....not for a moment.

Hell, Karen Hughes is more "political" if a woman is all they want.