[HairOfTheDog]

It's easy to hang out only on FRee Republic and think your opinion is shared by many. For most people in the country, this would not be a deal breaker, but a benefit.

That's just the way it is. I can see nothing but benefit to the country for the GOP nominating her.

[Howlin]

It's easy to hang out only on FRee Republic and think your opinion is shared by many.

It's not even shared by a lot of people here.

[Calpernia]

bumping

[LS]

I"m with you, and I have to say that talking to more and more Christian conservatives, they are VERY concerned about making abortion a "national" issue and much prefer leaving it to the states. There must be some consistency here, and since there is NOT going to be a "marriage amendment," we are likely going to have marriage issues defined and controlled entirely by states; that, in turn, pretty much requires abortion to be a states issue. I see the two as linked, and popular sentiment is going to track closely on both.

I'm a realist. No one is going to put the "Roe" genie back in the bottle. What we can do is get sensible about it and steadily reduce both the areas in which it's "acceptable" and the moral climate that would even tolerate it. From that perspective, I'm with zencat that it should be "legal" and never happen, because I just don't ever see any judicial or legislative repeal of Roe.