Well, as far as I am concerned she will never receive my vote. Personally, I wince everytime I hear the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life." No matter what word games a person choses to play. You are either for abortion or against it, or you are just plain confused.
I am anti-abortion. I consider abortion to be infanticide. No one should ever have the "choice" to legally comment infanticide. So, even though she is OK as Sec State. She can forget being the Republican nominee. Also, I find myself getting really ticked at President Bush setting her up to run for president.
One final zinger - even remotely suggesting she holds "libertarian" views makes her obnoxious to me. There are two groups on this forum that I just can't abide - hard core atheistic/naturalistic evolutionists and libertarians.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Sola Veritas
There goes her chance of being nominated.
2 posted on
03/11/2005 6:33:27 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: Sola Veritas
Well put. She wouldn't get any votes here either, even against Hillary. We'd sit it out.
5 posted on
03/11/2005 6:35:03 PM PST by
madprof98
To: Sola Veritas
6 posted on
03/11/2005 6:35:12 PM PST by
MisterRepublican
(I DEMAND THAT FOX NEWS GET JENNIFER ECCLESTON BACK FROM NBC!)
To: Sola Veritas
Ridiculous... do you even know what mildly pro choice means as defined by Condi Rice? Are all of you in this thread really closed minded to a black woman President?
7 posted on
03/11/2005 6:36:14 PM PST by
marajade
To: Sola Veritas
***Also, I find myself getting really ticked at President Bush setting her up to run for president.****
Ahhhhhh!!!! Poor baby!!!
To: Sola Veritas
I am mostly pro-life and somewhat pro-choice. What about it?
9 posted on
03/11/2005 6:36:38 PM PST by
sweetjane
To: Sola Veritas
My goodness, you'd throw out a reasoned intelligent candidate over one issue? If you don't want an abortion, don't have one. Teach your children it's wrong. But, pun intended, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!
10 posted on
03/11/2005 6:37:05 PM PST by
pa mom
To: Sola Veritas
This is the Achilles heel of a Rice nomination - one the RAT's will have no problem hammering on while pretending to be "mildly pro-choice." Madame Rice will have to change her postition or Roe will have to be overturned to make it a moot point.
14 posted on
03/11/2005 6:38:00 PM PST by
WorkingClassFilth
(Offending all people equally - pursuant to the directives of the CRA of 1964)
To: Sola Veritas
Well, as far as I am concerned she will never receive my voteSure....vote for Hillary.
That'll help.
To: Sola Veritas
>>>There are two groups on this forum that I just can't abide
I am a conservative libertarian (yes, it is possible. Unless 'conservative' means bullying others into living your lifestyle). There are groups of people I can't abide, that is people that think that others should live by their set of rules.
19 posted on
03/11/2005 6:39:21 PM PST by
sandbar
To: Sola Veritas
The abortion issue is important to me too, but I am more interested in whether Condi can kick ass and continue the Bush doctrine. I would rather have a "pro-choice" Condi than a "pro-life" McCain who always seems to grandstand and triangulate against conservatives on all other issues to show off for the media.
21 posted on
03/11/2005 6:39:56 PM PST by
darkmatter
(Let them hate. As long as they fear. -Julius Caesar)
To: Sola Veritas
Abortion is NOT something the Federal Government should decide. It's absurd to clog the courts and throw those in prison that choose it or practice.
I am pro-life and pro-choice. Abortion should be legal, but NEVER occur.
25 posted on
03/11/2005 6:41:11 PM PST by
zencat
(The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
To: Sola Veritas
It's easy to hang out only on FRee Republic and think your opinion is shared by many. For most people in the country, this would not be a deal breaker, but a benefit.
That's just the way it is. I can see nothing but benefit to the country for the GOP nominating her.
27 posted on
03/11/2005 6:41:48 PM PST by
HairOfTheDog
(It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
To: Sola Veritas
"...mildly pro-choice..." = "mildly pregnant"...
28 posted on
03/11/2005 6:41:55 PM PST by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Sola Veritas
I'm for the morning after pill. Does that make me mildly pro-choice?
30 posted on
03/11/2005 6:42:00 PM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
To: Sola Veritas
Hopefully Republicans won't nominate someone like Rice, Giuliani, or McCain.
To: Sola Veritas
34 posted on
03/11/2005 6:43:30 PM PST by
ApesForEvolution
(I just took a Muhammad and wiped my Jihadist with Mein Koran...come and get me nutbags.)
To: Sola Veritas
COUNT ME OUT as far as Condi Rice goes.
I am NOT voting for a "slighty" pro-death candidate.
To: Sola Veritas
We don't even know what "mildly pro-choice" means. It could mean she is against abortion except for cases of rape and incest. We should let her clarify her position before outright rejecting her.
To: Sola Veritas
She's got my vote after that!!!
46 posted on
03/11/2005 6:45:24 PM PST by
MonroeDNA
(Handshakes can cause the spread of disease. Be considerate--sniff my butt.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson