Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi "Mildly Pro-Choice"
http://www.drudgereport.com ^ | 3-11-2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 03/11/2005 6:32:41 PM PST by Sola Veritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,521-1,539 next last
To: Mo1
Yeah there would hardly be any debate here if she just said the 3 exceptions rule. That is the sweet spot in public opinion and just saying the word pro-choice will irk many like myself.
481 posted on 03/11/2005 7:58:50 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: deport
Do the three exceptions make on 'slightly pro-choice'

Rape
Incest
Life of the mother


One tries to be compassionate. "Life of the mother" sets up life against life. You can define it. (Unfortunately pro-aborts say all pregnancies threaten the life of the mother. You have to define it above a de minimis threat.) But when you have a rape and incest exception, they all become claims of rape or incest without charging, naming or having DNA evidence on anyone. Or if someone is named, the charges would be dropped after the abortion. It is not life against life and amounts to executing the child for unproven charges against the father. Pregnancy is not permanent like murder. We make victims go through many things including physical examinations, depositions and courtroom questioning often for periods longer than nine months. After that she doesn't have to keep the child. I just can't see killing it or killing millions on false charges for the hundreds or even thousands of true ones even if I did agree with it.
482 posted on 03/11/2005 7:59:06 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #483 Removed by Moderator

To: notorious vrc
I would prefer that Al Qaeda terrorists kill millions of Americans with nuclear bombs than for the Republican party to ever be led by someone even "mildly" pro-abortion.

McCAIN [to Bush]: Do you believe in the exemption, in the case of abortion, for rape, incest, and life of the mother?

BUSH: Yeah, I do.

Source: GOP Debate on the Larry King Show Feb 15, 2000

484 posted on 03/11/2005 7:59:27 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter
Think about that. President Hillary Clinton.

We survived Billy. My state survive Jim Blanchard. We're surviving Granholm. It's not easy, but we're surviving.

We'll survive Hitlery if it happens, more so than we would with John Kerry if I may add. (and no, I'd never vote for Hillary) We'd survive her, since 1/2 of the country, including even the spineless pols in DC, hates her guts to begin with and will do anything to make sure she loses.

485 posted on 03/11/2005 7:59:44 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (Mark Sanford for President in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear

I think it is a poor strategy. The truth is a big constituency of Bush was people who are not antiabortion. The prolifer repubs need the prochoice pubs and vice versa.

The risk when pro lifers out of hand stay home to defeat a republican, as what happened with Bush the elder is that the republican party will move to the middle, picking up democrats, some of whom have their biggest objections to republicans who are very conservative.

I am rambling but I think the conservative wing of the republican party could be made marginal by the party moving to the middle and picking up conservative dems. And then either extreme of the pubs and dems are out in the cold, a permanent minority.

All this, "I will stay at home if the candidate is not pro life" makes it likely you will end up at home with no reason and no one to vote for and more importantly no one who represents you.


486 posted on 03/11/2005 8:00:03 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers

No.

I'm afraid I don't know what "mildly pro-choice" means, except that she is willing to kill babies if it's convenient.

The Republicans have the momentum moving their way, almost entirely because of what is variously known as the conservative religious or pro-life vote. That's why Daschle was voted out--because he blocked the appointment of pro-life judges. That's why Bush gained senators in a midterm election which happens very rarely. That's why Bush picked up more Hispanic votes and Evangelical votes and Catholic votes.

If the Republicans turn their backs on that progress, they will lose everything they have gained among Hispanics, Evangelicals, and Catholics. They will even kick away the chance of peeling away black voters by appealing to them as social conservatives concerned about family.

They will lose the moral high ground they have so painfully gained over the Democrats, and be seen as nothing but country clubbers and me-firsters.


487 posted on 03/11/2005 8:00:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Please explain what is un-christian about my comment. Thank you

Well .. I was always taught that prayers were meant/said/ask to help people .. even the ones we disagree with

You comment sure didn't seem like you gave a rats behind

488 posted on 03/11/2005 8:00:17 PM PST by Mo1 (Question to the Media/Press ... Why are you hiding the Eason Jordan tapes ????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: All
I think we are overrating Hillary Clinton. No one in the red states will vote for her no matter what "centrist" positions she takes. Her mask is thin. What we should be worrying about is an unknown. Someone like Mark Warner or Evean Bayh. Someone like that can squeak right under our noses.
489 posted on 03/11/2005 8:00:29 PM PST by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: section9
And though she has two strikes against her---pro-choice and LOST---she is otherwise head and shoulders above the rest. Heck, George W. Bush has one of those strikes also; he's not opposed to LOST. Are we unhappy that he's the President? Sorry we voted for him in 2000, instead of staying home and letting Al Gore win? Are we sorry we voted for him instead of the Traitor?

They say in the foxhole there are no atheists. I believe that on Election Day there will be no ultramon...what you said ;) If Hillary is the candidate and ahead in the polls that day, I'll vote for a serial abortionist before abstaining and electing her thereby. So will all the white-hot righteous freepers flaming Rice tonight.

I hope.

490 posted on 03/11/2005 8:00:49 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I am not as sure of the republic surviving as you are. We are close to not surviving.


491 posted on 03/11/2005 8:00:57 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Travis McGee

You and me both.

It's best to just let them call you what they'd like.

It's like Brer Rabbit and the tar baby. When someone here calls you a racist or against brown skinned folk, the more you defend, the more it sticks. Like when did you stop beating your wife or snorting coke et al.

Do like Travis McGee does. Ping the powers that be and ask them to tell the race baitors to desist. It works good for him.

We are getting a nice respite from some of the more egregious offenders right now due to travis's efforts.

(courtesy ping)


492 posted on 03/11/2005 8:01:08 PM PST by wardaddy (I don't think Muslims are good for America....just a gut instinct thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

Comment #493 Removed by Moderator

To: Peach

Thank you. This is just too close to home, I guess.

I have a friend on the other side. She just adopted a lovely son from an 18 year old with the guts to stick it out. I have nothing but awe and love for that girl.

But you men have to remember: she will think of that child always, whether she had aborted it or given it to a loving home. Most of us women know that live begins at the moment of conception. But we know the other pains and loves that come with that. Makes it both easy and hard to judge.


494 posted on 03/11/2005 8:01:24 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Peach; marajade

I'm a little confused here - who has accused marajade of being racist? Saying someone has played the race card simply means they've accused *others* of being racist, with no basis to do so. The posts prior to hers never gave any indication that they opposed her for anything other than the abortion issue, yet she chose to insult them and accuse them of racism anyway. To suggest people are using this issue to disguise some sort of racist desire to bring Condi down is to ignore the fact that threads about a Giuliani Presidency draw the same criticisms - and last time I checked, he was neither black nor female.


495 posted on 03/11/2005 8:01:45 PM PST by Fatalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Tell us what the "exception" is for murder?

Self defense, state executions, military/police actions, and in some states doctor-assisted "suicide."

496 posted on 03/11/2005 8:01:48 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: libertyman
his name is Michael Peroutka.

And he was lumped in with the other 1.3 percent under "Other."

Good luck.

497 posted on 03/11/2005 8:01:54 PM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Amen!


498 posted on 03/11/2005 8:02:11 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear

They would not deliver the baby before it was viable, since it was still alive. By then the damage was done.


499 posted on 03/11/2005 8:02:24 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
There are hardly any conservative dems who aren't socially conservative. That plan will not work.
500 posted on 03/11/2005 8:02:25 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,521-1,539 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson