Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mass55th
I can't imagine why they had only one deputy (and a female at that) looking after a known violent felon who had been smuggling weapons just yesterday . . .

Budget constraints or no budget constraints, this just does not make sense. When I worked at the federal courthouse, when we had a big trial with dangerous defendants, we had marshals watching the marshals who were watching the defendants, plus a marshal for the judge, plus one who walked with us law clerks when we had to go in and out of the courtroom . . .

3,185 posted on 03/11/2005 6:57:51 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3171 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother

The courtroom must have been stuffy with all those marshals and guards all watching everyone. Could you breathe will all that.


3,189 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:40 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3185 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother

We had a murder (double murder of witnesses against him in a child abuse case) trial in my upstate NY County last week and the defendant was in orange jump suit and shackles. There were 3 to 4 deputies assigned to him in the courtroom and when he was moved 2 to 3 more came in from outside. There seemed to be no question of security being insecure.


3,205 posted on 03/11/2005 7:09:36 PM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson