To: Sofa King
That's because that is an unscientific statement. Science is never 100% absolutely cannot be wrong.And that means there's always room for valid criticism, so it's kind of puzzling what all the fuss is about.
311 posted on
03/09/2005 7:59:44 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
The fuss is all about the fact that the "valid criticisms" are never scientific in nature, and rarely even apply to the theory of evolution (ie, the constant describing of evolution as random).
317 posted on
03/09/2005 8:06:27 PM PST by
Sofa King
(MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval.)
To: tacticalogic
The fuss is about the word "valid".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson