Mr. Gutierrez said. "Mexico doesn't want the rights of its citizens transgressed...
In related news, MALDEF has filed a $32 Million lawsuit against Arizona rancher Roger Barnett and Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever, alleging they abused 14 illegal immigrants on Barnett's property and that Dever did nothing about it.
Whose rights? When does the term ILLEGAL come into play?
MALDEF's lawsuit basically asserts that the United States cannot prevent invasion because to do so would violate the "civil rights" of the invaders. They will almost certainly refer to UN resolutions on "migrants" to buttress this argument.
The fact that they picked out Barnett and Dever is just a detail to them. Essentially, they intend to use the courts of the United States to try and have the immigration laws of the United States declared null and void.
And in related news, isn't it wonderful to hear that Mexican senators are coming to Arizona to "review" the effect of a law passed by the citizens of an American state, and to try and "prevent" such laws in other American states? Twenty years ago I couldn't have imagined reading much less saying that. Maybe even ten years ago.
Maybe the citizens of Arizona could greet them with a welcoming committee and free one-way tickets back home. The same day.
The illegals have state given "civil rights", UN given "human rights", but they don't trump God given Constitutional rights.
MALDEF is suspect from the start
See MALDEF - Enemy Of American Democracy
-- and --
Critics of immigration law turn attention to election mandates (MALDEF at it again with AZ Prop 200)
If only the state and the feds would pass a law that if you file a civil suit and lose you must pay all court costs and defendants legal fees. A lawyer has three such cases in his history and he/she is called before the attorney's disciplinary board to explain he/she should not be disciplined for Barristry.
This is unbelievable. Who the hell does Mexico think she is?
Something is going on...