To: o_zarkman44
Husbands have rights as well! Perhaps, but to suggest that a husband should be able to move in with another woman, sire to children by her, and pledge to marry her, without forfeiting his rights as husband, is to make a mockery of marriage.
68 posted on
03/03/2005 11:12:24 PM PST by
supercat
(For Florida officials to be free of the Albatross, they should let it fly away.)
To: supercat
Somewhere I see a woman involved in half of what you are saying....... does she have no morality interfering in a mans marriage? Or is it all the big bad husbands fault?
Nope.
To: supercat
Mrs. Schiavo shouldn't lose her rights just because people interfered and delayed them from being carried out sooner. By denying her the end-care outcome that she discussed with her husband, do-gooders have not only stolen her self-determination, but have stolen years of Mr. Schiavo's life.
It's a red herring, a total straw man, to talk about his relationship with this other woman because if that relationship is needed to justify the do-gooders taking away Mrs. Schiavo's choice, then blocking the choice was unjustified in the first place.
99 posted on
03/04/2005 12:17:28 AM PST by
Gondring
(They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
To: supercat
Prior to those things, a mockery of marriage was made when they denied the Schiavos' rights.
270 posted on
03/04/2005 10:35:03 PM PST by
Gondring
(They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson