Posted on 02/26/2005 5:39:16 PM PST by Pikamax
Here's a clue about their attitude: their casual term for heterosexual, family-forming couples is "breeders". They mean it as a slur.
You're quite right, IMHO.
How does the accusation of the neo-Marxist press that it is bigotry to believe that homosexual behavior is sinful accord with my right to exercise the religion that was observed by all of the Founders except Jefferson?
LOL -that was before the news article...
bttt
With an average life expectancy of 42 years, a horrid new cultural phenomena restricted to the homosexual community known as "bug chasers", far more powerful, virulent strains of HIV that can't be treated, I'd say that Reguindin has made at least one statement that makes sense.
I think the worst thing that the homosexual community could have done is call attention to itself through militant activism. It's not just conservative elements that consider them a vital threat to a healthy social structure. Even Darwinists and other groups with similar common sense persuasions are going to find themselves at odds with a community that behave so recklessly.
And this thing with the more and more virulent forms of HIV is absolutely frightening. The homosexual community openly acts as living human disease incubators. At this rate, it's only a matter of time before some horrible virus mutates beyond it's current pathology and begins to affect people who don't partake in this high risk behavior.
How long will we stand by idly while these people are playing with our very lives?
We need to begin identifying and isolating those who are actively spreading HIV through our communities. If they can't help themselves, society needs to step in and end this cycle of death they perpetuate.
It is no longer a "Civil Rights" issue, it never was. It's a "Civilization" issue, as in we'd like civilization to continue.
"I dont blame them for being afraid, Aids would frighten the hell out of me too."
Amen to that. The really sad part is that Reguindin wants us to believe the gays have more reason to fear us "breeders" than AIDS. In other words, to Reguindin and his ilk, your average middle American, Christian, heterosexual male is more dangerous than AIDS.
That is his lie.
Lust is such that predators get bored of butts they've plucked and must ruffle the rumps of unspoiled youth.
We already know they are people. Mentally diseased people whose behavior we won't tolerate, but people none the less.
Then they go and through a recruitment dance where men can meet and molest post pubescent children and get upset when it gets cancelled.
I pray that God will save and change all these 'homosexuals'. But if they refuse to be saved and changed I pray that God will kill them before they drag others into hell with them
SEE, SEE, SEE...!!! PROOF that voters opposing same-sex marriage are NAZIS!!!!!
The reason they refer to Spokane as 'heartland' is because, to the best of my knowledge, it votes Republican by a majority. Spokane County voted Bush over Kerry 55%-43%, Nethercutt over Murray 51%-47% and Rossi over Gregoire 53%-45%. That may not qualify as 'heartland' but it's still better than King County.
Check under the topics: Child abuse, Crime, Health Hazards, Manipulation, Mental Health, Pedophilia, and Schools.
Homosexuality isn't bad because it creates diseases. Homosexuality is bad because it is a disease, which when untreated will eventually destroy the one infected with it and spread to others who are not already infected.
Most 'homosexuals' are that way because they were molested or otherwise abused. These are damaged individuals who continue to damage other individuals. (additional major causes are having a absent or insufficient relationship with one's father and being relentlessly teased by one's peers during the formative years. Almost every 'gay' will have one of these causes in their past if they are honest enough to admit it. Every one that I've ever talked to has)
The original determination by the APA that homosexuality was not a mental illness (resulting in it being delisted in the DSM III) was done under extreme pressure from 'gay activist' groups and had no scientific evidence supporting it whatsoever. In fact, the lead proponent for delisting it now admits that was a mistake.
The practice of homosexual behavior is usually accompanied by other mental illnesses (see the links)
Biologically, homosexual behavior fails the 'fit' test. The male member fits perfectly into the female member (angle of the erect male member equals angle of the female member while face to face). The female member is perfectly prepared for receiving the male member, it has a thick lining and a lubricating coating of mucous to prevent wear and tear from friction. Only a union of the male and the female is productive of offspring.
The rectum has a lining only 1-2 cells thick, is easily damaged and results in an ideal environment for infectious agents to thrive and multiply. And of course no male has ever gotten pregnant
Then of course there is the compulsion among those who practice homosexuality to recruit (molest other young men) as they cannot reproduce.
Read the list of links and be educated.
The final nail in homosexuality's coffin is the extreme denial that the homosexual community exhibits whenever the topic of ex-gays comes up. They claim once gay always gay yet thousands of ex-gays exist and lead perfectly happy, mentally healthy, heterosexual lives.
The scientific and social evidence that the practice of homosexaulity is both abnormal and damaging is so overwhelming that any biblical case against it isn't really needed. But to those who already believe the bible it is yet another witness that God knows what He was talking about. (and perhaps to those who don't believe it may be a hint that maybe they should give the bible another look)
Missed this. In my experience there is no such thing as a monogamous 'homosexual' person. If they are active at all they are promiscuous.
(One possible exception would be my brother, he's so afraid of dying that he seldom leaves his apartment. At least that's the way it looks to us. He leads a lonely and sad existence trapped in his perversion)
The German SS recalled in NAZI Germany, how the followers of Hitler had been 'demonized' by the Jews. Go figure.
It is neither irrelevant nor false. What is irrelevant is what the animals do. It is perfectly natural for chimpanzees to kill the young of other male chimpanzees. (same for lions etc) But this is unnatural for humans. Can't use animals to explain/justify human behavior
For the human, as defined by biology and physiology, homosexual relations are unnatural
False because several animal species have been observed to engage in homosexual activity in the wild, and irrelevant because, well, times change.
Times change but mankind doesn't. Our anatomy hasn't changed at all. Tab A goes into slot B is still the only natural sexual union.
Since you are looking for a discussion let me ping the list master for this topic and we'll get you all the non-biblical responses you could dream of.
Or, you could always major in extra-curricular grade-enhancement.
A refuge for under-aged kids to have sex with who?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.