Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: captcanada
No Sunsong. You "think" I came here to lecture, you have no idea. I'm a member here, no one told me I would only be a guest. You have other similar posts to other people, so I know what your real problem is.

Are you saying that you were unaware that Free Republic is an "American" site that its stated purpose is furthering grassroots conservatism "in America"?

And since you have not dealt with your false statement that no missile tests have succeeded - I think it is clear that you are not being mature or responsible about what you are posting.

It is also clear to me that you came on this thread in order to lecture us.

134 posted on 02/25/2005 9:17:55 AM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Sunsong; captcanada

I think you guys are talking about two different sets of tests here. The successful tests were ship-based interceptors fired at short range ballistic missles ... described to be like scuds in this article ...

http://www.canada.com/national/story.html?id=e26fb03f-1659-4e0c-9c79-95c74cc2f9a2

The other tests that, I don't believe were successful, were from land-based interceptors, which would be responsible for taking out ICBMs.

Regardless, I don't see how the failures are an issue ... yet. The system is in the testing phase and failures are advantageous ... learn from your mistakes and all. I believe the system will eventually be successful ... unless the government is pressured to shut it down. I can't see that happening though.

Just my thoughts.


135 posted on 02/25/2005 9:28:08 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson