Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Yep, an ordinary federal statute would have sufficed. The 18th amendment was not required, but the temperance reformers thought it would be harder to change.

You have been trying to sell that steaming pile for months. It was BS then, it's still BS, and when you tell that fairy tale next week, it will be BS than as well.

164 posted on 02/24/2005 10:24:19 AM PST by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras
I've asked you before. Prove to me the 18th was required.

Last time I got crickets. I don't expect anything different this time.

No, you just sit there mocking everyone else with nothing to add. Easier I guess, huh?

184 posted on 02/24/2005 11:05:02 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson