That's it. King William V it is.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
02/22/2005 1:14:53 PM PST by
MadIvan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Y..a..w..n! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
3 posted on
02/22/2005 1:16:06 PM PST by
rockabyebaby
(What goes around, comes around!)
To: MadIvan
4 posted on
02/22/2005 1:16:27 PM PST by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: MadIvan
5 posted on
02/22/2005 1:16:50 PM PST by
najida
(Honest judge, how those toasters keep falling in the bathtub, I'll never know!)
To: MadIvan
Quite right.
It wouldn't be the same without Freddie Mercury.
6 posted on
02/22/2005 1:16:54 PM PST by
fishtank
To: MadIvan
King William V it is. Sorta looks that way, doesn't it? The King has to be married in the church. Right?
7 posted on
02/22/2005 1:16:58 PM PST by
Corin Stormhands
(One Iraqi purple finger took more courage than John Kerry's three purple hearts.)
To: MadIvan
8 posted on
02/22/2005 1:17:31 PM PST by
pgkdan
To: LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; agrace; EggsAckley; dinasour; ...
12 posted on
02/22/2005 1:17:57 PM PST by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
To: MadIvan
So you're saying that upon her death, William will become King instead of Charles? Did Charles get the memo?
13 posted on
02/22/2005 1:18:08 PM PST by
Endeavor
To: MadIvan
If she ain't going, we ain't going etiher. Cancel the Freeper car pool immediately.
They were probably trying to gyp us with a cash bar too!
14 posted on
02/22/2005 1:18:18 PM PST by
pikachu
(BE alert -- we need more lerts!)
To: MadIvan
One word comes to mind whenever the subject of Charles and Camilla comes up:
Tacky.
To: MadIvan
18 posted on
02/22/2005 1:19:11 PM PST by
PeterFinn
(Why is it that people who know the least know it the loudest?)
To: MadIvan
Think there was a deal cut before permission was given to marry? Looks that way to me. If Her Majesty was concerned about the situation and wanted to hold him to it, before the marriage would be the time to negotiate.
20 posted on
02/22/2005 1:19:46 PM PST by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: MadIvan
What some people will do to get out of spending a few bucks on a present. I hear she was even offered a guarantee of catching the bouquet, but no deal.
27 posted on
02/22/2005 1:22:28 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(Happy President's Day! Abraham Lincoln= our greatest president)
To: MadIvan
I was rather hoping Charles would stand aside, eventually.
BTW, William could take the throne as King Arthur, if he so chose.
30 posted on
02/22/2005 1:23:01 PM PST by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: MadIvan
WE are not amused
To: MadIvan
Thank you so much for the post Ivan. I read/heard that the "marriage" will not be "legal" as the Royals must be married in a Church according to the Marriage Act of 1832(36?) Have you heard anything about that? Best regards,
To: MadIvan
41 posted on
02/22/2005 1:25:11 PM PST by
cvq3842
To: MadIvan
With a mother like that, it's no wonder he's not got his head on straight.
42 posted on
02/22/2005 1:25:43 PM PST by
OldFriend
(America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
To: MadIvan
Okay, that's it. Count me out, too!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson