Skip to comments.
QUEEN WILL NOT ATTEND WEDDING
Sky News ^
| February 22, 2005
| Staff
Posted on 02/22/2005 1:14:52 PM PST by MadIvan
The Queen will not attend the wedding of Charles and Camilla, the couple have announced.
She will, however, attend the church blessing after the civil ceremony.
The couple are due to get married at the Guildhall in Windsor.
More Follows...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: camilla; charles; enjoytheshackles; humantyranny; monarchysucks; queen; royals; royalwedding; subjectsnotcitizens; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-235 next last
To: MacArthur
Not if the Queen can help it.
201
posted on
02/22/2005 4:02:48 PM PST
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
To: MadIvan
Whoooooooooooooooooooo cares???????????????????????????
To: MadIvan
I read once in a text book (published in the 1860's)that after Edward II abdication and Hugh Despenser was executed in 1326, Parliament passed a law that a Despenser family member could never become king. I believe this is William's lineage.
203
posted on
02/22/2005 4:04:32 PM PST
by
lizma
To: Condor51
Wouldn't it be hilarious if the Queen outlived both Charles and Camilla?
To: fishtank
RE: 9, clearly Lady Diane had a positive influence on the bloodline.
205
posted on
02/22/2005 4:12:52 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(This just in from CBS: "There is no bias at CBS")
To: t_skoz
I don't know....To me, British royalty is like the "flag" wearing a bad hat.
206
posted on
02/22/2005 4:20:37 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Friends stab you from the front." -- Oscar Wilde)
To: Condor51
Huh? I think she does look alot like Diana. It's the same look & eyes. There isn't that much imagination needed.
To: MadIvan
Even is the Queen does not attend does she not have to give her permission for Charles to marry? If so, it seems that her attendance is neither here nor there in terms of importance. It does not automatically mean that Charles will not become King. If he married without permission it would sure present some problems.
To: MadIvan
"However, there is a precedent in which the heir can be designated in a will. "
Would that be Edward VI? Wasn't he talked into designating his cousin Lady Jane Gray as his successor while on his deathbed?
209
posted on
02/22/2005 5:39:02 PM PST
by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: MinuteGal
I do think it is rather unfair for folks to compare Charles with William. William is a young man. Who knows what choices he will make during the next thirty years of his life.
To: pgkdan
Whatever....and still gay
211
posted on
02/22/2005 5:42:01 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
To: MadIvan
I for sure thought Elton John would be there.
To: PeterFinn
"She is Commander in Chief of the military forces and the civil government answers to her. She has the power to dissolve the government and call for elections and she can simply fire the Prime Minister if she so desires" Wow...when Arnie hears this he will be righteously peeved
213
posted on
02/22/2005 5:45:23 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
To: TheBigB
"If William becomes King, does Harry have any official title? I was just curious" Honorable spare king
214
posted on
02/22/2005 5:47:18 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
To: onyx
Diana and Lillie resemble one another, IMO. Especially their eyes.
215
posted on
02/22/2005 6:30:20 PM PST
by
barker
(I have knocked on the door of this man's soul and found someone home, Zell Miller on G.W. Bush)
To: fishtank
I think Freddie is busy decomposing another song right now...
To: barker
The eyes for sure.
Stunning similarity.
217
posted on
02/22/2005 6:46:10 PM PST
by
onyx
("First you look to God, then to Fox News" -- Denny Crane, Republican...lol.)
To: spokeshave
That's good. How about His Highness, the Small Emergency Backup King?
BTW, I think the queen would be wise to pass over Charles. He could end the monarchy. As an American, royalty means little to me, but it would be hard for any of the former Royal family to actually work for a living. Right now they make a lot of money acting goofy and having people write about them. Kind of like Madonna or Jennifer Anniston.
218
posted on
02/22/2005 6:54:53 PM PST
by
Richard Kimball
(It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
To: MacArthur
The Queen may well outlive them. Has anyone considered the possibility that Camilla is ill? She is a heavy smoker. It would explain the announcement and the speed with which the ceremony is to be performed.
To: MadIvan
Well, I guess Wills will stay out of the New Forest.... and I'm not so sure William IV was so wonderful....
I always thought Charles had all the faults of Edward VIII and none of his virtues (were there any?).... or perhaps the faults of John Lackland and none of his virtues...
220
posted on
02/22/2005 7:35:55 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-235 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson