Do the evo's have ANY idea how silly they look on this thread. It's hilarious!
Do the evo's have ANY idea how silly they look on this thread. It's hilarious!
Anthropologists are closer to the semi-science of sociology than they are to the real science of biology. So, we have that going for us. ;-)
Not nearly as funny as the creationists who continually post lies and misinformation which has been repeatedly debunked, all the while complaining of "spamming", as well as those who offer them loud hosannahs for it.
Not to mention the total refusal to retract or correct the misstatements.
The very obviously pasted-in "Atheists for Darwin" sign throws the entire credibility of that image into question.
You posted this image, from a creationist website (run by a creationist banned from FreeRepublic for making bizarre accusations against Jim Robinson, by the way):
But it has obviously been doctored -- the "Atheists for Evolution" sign is clearly Photoshopped, since the words don't line up with the angle of the sign, but do *PERFECTLY* line up pixel-perfect along the image's horizontal. The sloppy masking of the guy on the right is another dead giveaway (note the "edging" of pure white pixels in spots, especially on the upper left of his shoulder, not to mention the fact he's twice as big as anyone else). And that much was obvious even *before* I found the original, undoctored image with a Google search:
And now I can see that the sign on the left has been Photoshopped as well. And there was *no* mention of evolution on those signs, or in the larger group photo also on the same web page. So you're just FRAUDULENTLY PHOTOSHOPPING in out of NOWHERE any "connection" of these folks to "evolutionists".
If you guys allegedly have such a good case, why is it you always seem to be faking it and engaging in fraud?