[Ichneumon]

["No, he'd swear they did, because of the huge amount of evidence that they had."]

ROFLMAO. Yes you are right. That's exactly what he would claim.

Okay, I'll bite -- why do you find it hilarious that he would make a statement based on the evidence which supports it?

[shubi]

"why do you find it hilarious that he would make a statement based on the evidence which supports it?"

I think they took off their aluminum hats again.

[DannyTN]

"why do you find it hilarious"

We are talking about "pigs with wings". He would claim as evolutionists always do, that he has tons of evidence, when in fact he has none.

No doubt he would line up pictures of pot bellied pigs next to large pigs, and winged pigs to support his case. He'd bring out the list of "29 evidences" in favor of evolution, most of which either refute evolution or are neutral.

He would go on and on about how wings evolved in birds and bats and how it's not surprising that wings evolved on pigs.

It's like watching the Iraqi Information Minister come out and with all confidence and seriousness say they are winning the war.