Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars
Drudge Report | 16 Feb | edcoil

Posted on 02/16/2005 12:45:39 PM PST by edcoil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: boomop1

You are soooo right!


21 posted on 02/16/2005 1:09:15 PM PST by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
Don't let them kid you! The have photographic evidence, too. Just look!



22 posted on 02/16/2005 1:10:49 PM PST by Lady Jag (All I want is a kind word, a warm bed, and unlimited power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
...strong evidence that life may exist...

Yep, that confirms it! Break out the bottle of dust and we'll toast to this Tutor Turtle moment in time.

But Mr. Wizard... "Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh".

23 posted on 02/16/2005 1:12:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars

They still haven't proved to me that there is any evidence of intelligent life at NASA.

24 posted on 02/16/2005 1:21:40 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

"I still don't understand why trace amounts of methane on Mars means life, but oceans of methane on Titan are natural."

You beat me to it. But, I suppose the stock answer has something to do with distance from the sun, temperature, etc.

Perhaps Mars has a significant number of underground cows?


25 posted on 02/16/2005 1:24:46 PM PST by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: w6ai5q37b

I've no doubt. "Maybe" is maybe not worth alerting the media....unless you're trying to drum up support!


26 posted on 02/16/2005 1:27:03 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Thanks for the ping. This is very interesting.


27 posted on 02/16/2005 1:28:48 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
"If there is life on Mars, how do we go about exploring the planet without having a negative impact on that life? "

It's a big planet. Any impact we have will be negligible.

28 posted on 02/16/2005 1:30:13 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

ROFL at the image of flatulent Martian cows living underground! If only Bessie could've held that one in, we'd have never found them!


29 posted on 02/16/2005 1:47:18 PM PST by BMIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Who is the person in the picture with Sean?


30 posted on 02/16/2005 1:49:36 PM PST by bbbumble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BMIC

I can see the Martians hiding in their little caves as the Rovers pass by:

"Yornlkt, shut up. They're getting closer."
"I'm being quiet, Bcvinq, you shut up."
"No, you shut up."
"You shut up."
"No, you."
"You."

"Who farted? Oh, crap, the little thing with wheels just stopped!!! Way to go Yornlkt, you moron. There goes the neighborhood."


31 posted on 02/16/2005 1:52:46 PM PST by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bbbumble

No idea, I was just making a joke.


32 posted on 02/16/2005 1:56:30 PM PST by thoughtomator (If Islam is a religion, so is Liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars

They must have found a sign that read "Future site of a Wal*Mart Supercenter"
33 posted on 02/16/2005 2:03:11 PM PST by armyman (I'm may not agree with what you say, but I will sacrifice everything to defend your right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

I thought that was Jeri Ryan without make up.


34 posted on 02/16/2005 2:12:16 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Methane could be supplied by three sources: comet impact, volcanism and bacteria. Titan is thought to be geologically active, whereas Mars thought to be geologially inactive. On Mars, methane quickly oxidizes into water and carbon dioxide. Any detectable amount would need to be continuously replenished. On the other hand, Titan has an atmosphere which is neutral to oxidization or reduction, which would allow levels to build up over time.


35 posted on 02/16/2005 2:14:36 PM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edcoil; grizzfan; Lori675; dennisw; JennysCool; lainie; bd476; olde north church; Cheapskate; ...

Coast to Coast Ping List

Note: Richard Hoaglund described this a while ago...and said NASA was sitting on it.

36 posted on 02/16/2005 2:14:45 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Must be budget review time for NASA.


37 posted on 02/16/2005 2:19:05 PM PST by Perdogg (Rumsfeld for President - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
Actually, given that there is still water trapped underneath the surface of the Martian soil, I think chances are good that low-level microbes--though at most up to bacteria level--are still living off the subsurface water and nutrients in the soil. This is based on the discovery of low-level life forms in places on Earth that technically should not support life, such as near deep-sea vents, in the polar regions, and deep underground.

This will push forward the inclusion of very sophisticated bioscience experiments on the Mars Science Laboratory lander that will arrive on Mars in 2009. MSL, unlike the current Mars Exploration Rovers, will be powered by a "nuclear" battery that will allow MSL to run for up to two years after landing. That means MSL could travel well over 200 kilometers (124 miles) during its operational lifetime looking for lifeforms beneath the Martian surface.

38 posted on 02/16/2005 2:21:32 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic

Thanks for the explanation.

So where does methane in comets come from?

If volcanism generates methane, that implies, that the mantle has methane. Wouldn't it be logical to assume that there is a slow seepage of methane from the mantle up through the ground?


39 posted on 02/16/2005 2:22:06 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Here, you might find this article useful on the topic.
40 posted on 02/16/2005 2:26:46 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson