Skip to comments.
NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars
Drudge Report
| 16 Feb
| edcoil
Posted on 02/16/2005 12:45:39 PM PST by edcoil
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Next up, environment wacks proving we came from mars but destroyed it with global warming.
1
posted on
02/16/2005 12:45:42 PM PST
by
edcoil
To: edcoil
Too bad there is no sign of life in the US Senate!
2
posted on
02/16/2005 12:46:37 PM PST
by
llevrok
(Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro!)
To: edcoil
hidden away in caves Aha! That's where Bin Laden is!
3
posted on
02/16/2005 12:47:31 PM PST
by
jwalburg
(Those buried included children still clutching toys)
To: edcoil
Oh man, ring the bells, sound the horns, NASA says "maybe." Definitely worth the Drudgereport top line....
To: farmfriend
5
posted on
02/16/2005 12:49:29 PM PST
by
Cornpone
(Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Who Dares Wins)
To: llevrok
6
posted on
02/16/2005 12:49:47 PM PST
by
jwalburg
(Those buried included children still clutching toys)
To: edcoil
Well, duh! Of course there's life on Mars... we have photographic proof:

Martian (Left) and discoverer (Right)
7
posted on
02/16/2005 12:52:16 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(If Islam is a religion, so is Liberal!)
To: edcoil
8
posted on
02/16/2005 12:53:59 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: edcoil
I still don't understand why trace amounts of methane on Mars means life, but oceans of methane on Titan are natural.
9
posted on
02/16/2005 12:53:59 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Modernman
Ping. I'd bet on it, if not where they hypothesize, then maybe near the polar caps. "Something" that fits the accepted definition of life is on Mars. Now. As for what may have been alive there in the past, it'll take men with picks, shovels, and patience to find out. Assuming we still give a damn.
10
posted on
02/16/2005 12:56:26 PM PST
by
BroncosFan
("It's worse than a crime - it's a mistake." Talleyrand.)
To: edcoil
They are desperate to find out what could be producing the methane,Underground herds of cows of course. What else could it be?
To: edcoil
It's just evidence of more subterranean Democrat voters.
12
posted on
02/16/2005 12:56:39 PM PST
by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops.)
To: edcoil
If there is life on Mars, how do we go about exploring the planet without having a negative impact on that life?
I'm not talking about a Prime Directive. I just wonder whether or how deeply the powers that be consider the ramifications of alien robots (ours) running around up there and possibly interfering in native ecosystems, however primitive, microscopic, or insignificant they may be.
I'm not any kind of earthy hippy type at all, just curious what opinions on that are.
13
posted on
02/16/2005 12:56:58 PM PST
by
Gefreiter
(When seconds count, the police are minutes away.)
To: edcoil
To: edcoil
Stoker and Lemkes research could lead the search for Martian biology underground, where standing water would help account for the curious methane signatures the two have been analyzing.They are desperate to find out what could be producing the methane, one attendee told Space News. Their answer
is drill, drill, drill.
DUmmies: I knew it I knew it! This is Bush/Cheney cabal doing - they are going to destroy the environment on Mars for oil!
To: edcoil
16
posted on
02/16/2005 12:58:19 PM PST
by
Beckwith
(I know Churchill, and Ward Churchill is no Churchill . . . he ain't an Indian either . . .)
To: edcoil
Art Bell and Sheila Jackson Lee both live on Mars.
17
posted on
02/16/2005 1:00:06 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Ray Charles --- a great musician and safer driver than Ted Kennedy)
To: edcoil; BurbankKarl; KevinDavis
To: edcoil
"Methane" huh?
There is also evidence that there is a large pocket of methane produced by the DNC. Please give ne $2Billion so I can go investigate. And BTW my robot will work.
19
posted on
02/16/2005 1:01:59 PM PST
by
American Vet Repairman
(If you are going to play with fire make sure someone is getting it on video.)
To: anniegetyourgun
Oh man, ring the bells, sound the horns, NASA says "maybe."
"Maybe" they're just saying it to get Congress to appropriate them more money. Not an unheard-of strategy in the world of government-supported science.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson